Literature DB >> 8630835

A sociobehavioural perspective on genetic testing and counselling for heritable breast, ovarian and colon cancer.

K G Macdonald1, B Doan, M Kelner, K M Taylor.   

Abstract

Testing for susceptibility to heritable breast, ovarian and colon cancer has unique psychosocial costs. Negative test results may not be sufficient to relieve anxiety, and positive results can cause sufficient distress to compromise patient compliance with surveillance and risk reduction measures. More needs to be learned about how sociocultural factors affect the understanding of risk, how decisions to undergo testing are made and how information about increased risk affects family dynamics. As the demand for testing and counselling grows, health care providers will be faced with new challenges and dilemmas. A better understanding of genetics by the public is needed to mitigate deterministic attitudes that can lead to the neglect of health promotion. Also of concern are the socioeconomic implications of being identified as having a high risk for heritable cancer and the dangers inherent in using genetics to explain sociological phenomena. Health care providers must take the lead in ensuring that developments in genetics are used to the benefit of all.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8630835      PMCID: PMC1487608     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  74 in total

1.  Obtaining consent from the family: a horizon for clinical ethics.

Authors:  S Spinsanti
Journal:  J Clin Ethics       Date:  1992

2.  The human genome project: has blind reductionism gone too far?

Authors:  A I Tauber; S Sarkar
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.416

3.  Effects of genetic screening on perceptions of health: a pilot study.

Authors:  T M Marteau; M van Duijn; I Ellis
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Sociocultural problems in genetic counselling.

Authors:  M Naveed; S R Phadke; A Sharma; S S Agarwal
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Familial cancer syndromes.

Authors:  C Eng; M Stratton; B Ponder; V Murday; D Easton; N Sacks; M Watson; R Eeles
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-03-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Psychological issues in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  C Lerman; R Croyle
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-03-28

7.  Physicians' attitudes toward disclosure of genetic information to third parties.

Authors:  G Geller; E S Tambor; B A Bernhardt; G A Chase; K J Hofman; R R Faden; N A Holtzman
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 8.  The psychological costs of screening for cancer.

Authors:  J Wardle; R Pope
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Ovarian cancer family and prophylactic choices.

Authors:  D G Evans; G Ribiero; D Warrell; D Donnai
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  The implications of the Human Genome Project for family practice.

Authors:  L A Whittaker
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Hereditary breast cancer. Psychosocial issues and family physicians' role.

Authors:  J C Carroll; R E Heisey; E Warner; V Goel; D R McCready
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Genetic susceptibility to cancer. Family physicians' experience.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Judith Belle Brown; Sean Blaine; Gord Glendon; Patricia Pugh; Wendy Medved
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.275

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.