PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic usefulness of three-dimensional (3D) stereotaxic surface projection (SSP) with that of standard transaxial display in brain positron emission tomography (PET) in Alzheimer disease (AD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standard transaxial section display and 3D-SSP PET image sets obtained after administration of 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose in 39 patients with probable AD (aged 53-82 years; 15 men, 24 women) and 40 subjects without AD (aged 21-78 years; 14 men, 26 women) were randomly interpreted. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. RESULTS: Diagnostic performance was superior with 3D SSP (Az[section]=0.94,Az[3D SSP]=0.99[Az=area under the ROC curve];P=.043). With 3D SSP, diagnosis of AD was equally good in beginners and experts. The sensitivity and specificity in questionable or mild dementia were 94% and 99% with 3D SSP and 79% and 88% with standard transaxial display. CONCLUSION: Accuracy of detecting AD was improved in PET with 3D SSP.
PURPOSE: To compare the diagnostic usefulness of three-dimensional (3D) stereotaxic surface projection (SSP) with that of standard transaxial display in brain positron emission tomography (PET) in Alzheimer disease (AD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standard transaxial section display and 3D-SSP PET image sets obtained after administration of 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose in 39 patients with probable AD (aged 53-82 years; 15 men, 24 women) and 40 subjects without AD (aged 21-78 years; 14 men, 26 women) were randomly interpreted. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. RESULTS: Diagnostic performance was superior with 3D SSP (Az[section]=0.94,Az[3D SSP]=0.99[Az=area under the ROC curve];P=.043). With 3D SSP, diagnosis of AD was equally good in beginners and experts. The sensitivity and specificity in questionable or mild dementia were 94% and 99% with 3D SSP and 79% and 88% with standard transaxial display. CONCLUSION: Accuracy of detecting AD was improved in PET with 3D SSP.
Authors: Christian Habeck; Norman L Foster; Robert Perneczky; Alexander Kurz; Panagiotis Alexopoulos; Robert A Koeppe; Alexander Drzezga; Yaakov Stern Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-02-14 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Paul R Borghesani; Shaune M DeMers; Vivek Manchanda; Sumit Pruthi; David H Lewis; Soo Borson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-07-28 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Peter K Panegyres; Jeffrey M Rogers; Michael McCarthy; Andrew Campbell; Jing Shan Wu Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2009-08-12 Impact factor: 2.474