Literature DB >> 8628593

Subcutaneous fentanyl and sufentanil infusion substitution for morphine intolerance in cancer pain management.

Andrew Paix1, Andrew Coleman, Judith Lees, Jane Grigson, Mary Brooksbank, David Thorne, Michael Ashby.   

Abstract

Eleven patients with cancer pain in a palliative care and chronic pain service required cessation of morphine due to unacceptable opioid side effects. In this retrospective study fentanyl was evaluated as a second-line subcutaneously infused opioid. Starting doses ranged from 100 to 1000 micrograms/24 h, and the duration of fentanyl infusion was 3-70 days. The clinically derived mean relative potency of fentanyl to morphine infusions was 68:1 (SD +/- 23; range: 15-100), and we now recommend cautious dose conversion at an approximate equivalence of 150-200 micrograms fentanyl for 10 mg morphine in non-opioid naive chronic cancer pain patients. All patients demonstrated an improvement in the adverse effect(s) for which the change in opioid was undertaken. Adequate pain relief was achieved in all but 1 patient with mixed nociceptive and neuropathic pelvic pain for whom an epidural infusion of a local anaesthetic/opioid mixture was required. Fentanyl was changed to the more potent synthetic opioid sufentanil in 2 patients for whom the fentanyl dose necessitated too large a volume for the portable syringe driver in use. The clinically derived sufentanil to fentanyl relative potencies were 24:1 and 16:1, respectively. This achieved good analgesia and maintained the favourable side-effect profile seen with fentanyl. Subcutaneous infusion appears to be a safe and viable route of fentanyl delivery, and provided effective analgesia with a low incidence of adverse effects in this small selected group of patients who were intolerant of subcutaneous morphine. We suggest a trial of subcutaneous fentanyl for selected patients who have intractable adverse effects on morphine, and it is now the second-line infusable opioid in our service. Further prospective evaluation of the role of these two synthetic mu opioid agonists in palliative care practice is warranted, as part of an evolving picture of variation in opioid side-effect profile seen with different drugs within the class.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8628593     DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(95)00084-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  16 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for the treatment of cancer pain in the new millennium.

Authors:  C Ripamonti; E D Dickerson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics of opioids in liver disease.

Authors:  I Tegeder; J Lötsch; G Geisslinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Opioid and Nonopioid Therapy in Cancer Pain: The Traditional and the New.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  1999

4.  An improved behavioural assay demonstrates that ultrasound vocalizations constitute a reliable indicator of chronic cancer pain and neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Martina Kurejova; Ulrike Nattenmüller; Ullrich Hildebrandt; Deepitha Selvaraj; Sebastian Stösser; Rohini Kuner
Journal:  Mol Pain       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.395

5.  Effects of fentanyl anesthesia and sufentanil anesthesia on regulatory T cells frequencies.

Authors:  Li Gong; Qian Qin; Lei Zhou; Wen Ouyang; Yanshuang Li; Yuhui Wu; Yunli Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-10-15

Review 6.  Pharmacological options for the management of refractory cancer pain-what is the evidence?

Authors:  B Afsharimani; K Kindl; P Good; J Hardy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  The opioid rotation ratio of hydrocodone to strong opioids in cancer patients.

Authors:  Akhila Reddy; Sriram Yennurajalingam; Hem Desai; Suresh Reddy; Maxine de la Cruz; Jimin Wu; Diane Liu; Eden Mae Rodriguez; Jessica Waletich; Seong Hoon Shin; Vicki Gayle; Pritul Patel; Shalini Dalal; Marieberta Vidal; Kimberson Tanco; Joseph Arthur; Kimmie Tallie; Janet Williams; Julio Silvestre; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-10-23

8.  Frequency, outcome, and predictors of success within 6 weeks of an opioid rotation among outpatients with cancer receiving strong opioids.

Authors:  Akhila Reddy; Sriram Yennurajalingam; Kalyan Pulivarthi; Shana L Palla; Xuan Wang; Jung Hye Kwon; Susan Frisbee-Hume; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-12-13

9.  Efficacy of opioid rotation to continuous parenteral hydromorphone in advanced cancer patients failing on other opioids.

Authors:  Wendy H Oldenmenger; Paul J Lieverse; Paul J J M Janssen; Walter Taal; Carin C D van der Rijt; Agnes Jager
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Compared With Morphine among Adult Patients with Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Astère Manirakiza; Laurent Irakoze; Sébastien Manirakiza; Prudence Bizimana
Journal:  East Afr Health Res J       Date:  2020-06-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.