Literature DB >> 25342316

The opioid rotation ratio of hydrocodone to strong opioids in cancer patients.

Akhila Reddy1, Sriram Yennurajalingam2, Hem Desai2, Suresh Reddy2, Maxine de la Cruz2, Jimin Wu2, Diane Liu2, Eden Mae Rodriguez2, Jessica Waletich2, Seong Hoon Shin2, Vicki Gayle2, Pritul Patel2, Shalini Dalal2, Marieberta Vidal2, Kimberson Tanco2, Joseph Arthur2, Kimmie Tallie2, Janet Williams2, Julio Silvestre2, Eduardo Bruera2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cancer pain management guidelines recommend initial treatment with intermediate-strength analgesics such as hydrocodone and subsequent escalation to stronger opioids such as morphine. There are no published studies on the process of opioid rotation (OR) from hydrocodone to strong opioids in cancer patients. Our aim was to determine the opioid rotation ratio (ORR) of hydrocodone to morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) in cancer outpatients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of consecutive patient visits at our supportive care center in 2011-2012 for OR from hydrocodone to stronger opioids. Data regarding demographics, Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), and MEDD were collected from patients who returned for follow-up within 6 weeks. Linear regression analysis was used to estimate the ORR between hydrocodone and MEDD. Successful OR was defined as 2-point or 30% reduction in the pain score and continuation of the new opioid at follow-up.
RESULTS: Overall, 170 patients underwent OR from hydrocodone to stronger opioid. The median age was 59 years, and 81% had advanced cancer. The median time between OR and follow-up was 21 days. We found 53% had a successful OR with significant improvement in the ESAS pain and symptom distress scores. In 100 patients with complete OR and no worsening of pain at follow-up, the median ORR from hydrocodone to MEDD was 1.5 (quintiles 1-3: 0.9-2). The ORR was associated with hydrocodone dose (r = -.52; p < .0001) and was lower in patients receiving ≥40 mg of hydrocodone per day (p < .0001). The median ORR of hydrocodone to morphine was 1.5 (n = 44) and hydrocodone to oxycodone was 0.9 (n = 24).
CONCLUSION: The median ORR from hydrocodone to MEDD was 1.5 and varied according to hydrocodone dose. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Hydrocodone; Opioid analgesics; Opioid-related disorders; Pain management; Palliative care

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25342316      PMCID: PMC4221365          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  49 in total

1.  Opioid rotation in the management of refractory cancer pain.

Authors:  Rose Anne Indelicato; Russell K Portenoy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Review and critique of opioid rotation practices and associated risks of toxicity.

Authors:  Lynn R Webster; Perry G Fine
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 3.  Cancer pain relief and palliative care. Report of a WHO Expert Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  1990

Review 4.  Managing difficult pain conditions in the cancer patient.

Authors:  Sebastiano Mercadante
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-02

5.  Characterizing the subjective, psychomotor, and physiological effects of a hydrocodone combination product (Hycodan) in non-drug-abusing volunteers.

Authors:  James P Zacny
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Effect of nitric oxide synthase inhibition on antinociceptive action of different doses of acetaminophen.

Authors:  M Bujalska
Journal:  Pol J Pharmacol       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct

7.  Profiling the subjective, psychomotor, and physiological effects of a hydrocodone/acetaminophen product in recreational drug users.

Authors:  James P Zacny; Sandra Gutierrez; Shahla A Bolbolan
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Intravenous oxycodone, hydrocodone, and morphine in recreational opioid users: abuse potential and relative potencies.

Authors:  William W Stoops; Kevin W Hatton; Michelle R Lofwall; Paul A Nuzzo; Sharon L Walsh
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Acetaminophen (paracetamol) improves pain and well-being in people with advanced cancer already receiving a strong opioid regimen: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial.

Authors:  Martin Stockler; Janette Vardy; Avinesh Pillai; David Warr
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Combination analgesics.

Authors:  W T Beaver
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1984-09-10       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Vertebral Augmentation Involving Vertebroplasty or Kyphoplasty for Cancer-Related Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-05-01

Review 2.  Transdermal buprenorphine and fentanyl patches in cancer pain: a network systematic review.

Authors:  Jin Seok Ahn; Johnson Lin; Setsuro Ogawa; Chen Yuan; Tony O'Brien; Brian Hc Le; Andrea M Bothwell; Hanlim Moon; Yacine Hadjiat; Abhijith Ganapathi
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.133

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.