Literature DB >> 8628340

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on television. Miracles and misinformation.

S J Diem1, J D Lantos, J A Tulsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Responsible, shared decision making on the part of physicians and patients about the potential use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) requires patients who are educated about the procedure's risks and benefits. Television is an important source of information about CPR for patients. We analyzed how three popular television programs depict CPR.
METHODS: We watched all the episodes of the television programs ER and Chicago Hope during the 1994-1995 viewing season and 50 consecutive episodes of Rescue 911 broadcast over a three-month period in 1995. We identified all occurrences of CPR in each episode and recorded the causes of cardiac arrest, the identifiable demographic characteristics of the patients, the underlying illnesses, and the outcomes.
RESULTS: There were 60 occurrences of CPR in the 97 television episodes--31 on ER, 11 on Chicago Hope, and 18 on Rescue 911. In the majority of cases, cardiac arrest was caused by trauma; only 28 percent were due to primary cardiac causes. Sixty-five percent of the cardiac arrests occurred in children, teenagers, or young adults. Seventy-five percent of the patients survived the immediate arrest, and 67 percent appeared to have survived to hospital discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: The survival rates in our study are significantly higher than the most optimistic survival rates in the medical literature, and the portrayal of CPR on television may lead the viewing public to have an unrealistic impression of CPR and its chances for success. Physicians discussing the use of CPR with patients and families should be aware of the images of CPR depicted on television and the misperceptions these images may foster.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CHICAGO HOPE; Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; RESCUE 911

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8628340     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199606133342406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  64 in total

1.  Resurrecting autonomy during resuscitation--the concept of professional substituted judgment.

Authors:  M Ardagh
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  What cancer patients want to know: national strategies and individual needs

Authors: 
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-07

3.  When All Else Is Done: The Challenge of Improving Antemortem Care.

Authors:  W Clay Jackson
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1999-10

4.  DNR, DNAR, or AND? Is Language Important?

Authors:  Joseph L Breault
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2011

5.  ER vs. ED: a comparison of televised and real-life emergency medicine.

Authors:  Brian A Primack; Traci Roberts; Michael J Fine; Francesca R Dillman Carpentier; Kristen R Rice; Amber E Barnato
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 1.484

6.  Epidemiology and prognosis of coma in daytime television dramas.

Authors:  David Casarett; Jessica M Fishman; Holly Jo MacMoran; Amy Pickard; David A Asch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-12-24

7.  Racial and ethnic differences in preferences for end-of-life treatment.

Authors:  Amber E Barnato; Denise L Anthony; Jonathan Skinner; Patricia M Gallagher; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation on Flemish television: challenges to the television effects hypothesis.

Authors:  J Van den Bulck; K Damiaans
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  How U.S. Doctors Die: A Cohort Study of Healthcare Use at the End of Life.

Authors:  Daniel D Matlock; Traci E Yamashita; Sung-Joon Min; Alexander K Smith; Amy S Kelley; Stacy M Fischer
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 10.  Determining resuscitation preferences of elderly inpatients: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher Frank; Daren K Heyland; Benjamin Chen; Donald Farquhar; Kathryn Myers; Ken Iwaasa
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.