Literature DB >> 8627837

Long-term results with Hydroflex and Dynaflex penile prostheses: device survival comparison to multicomponent inflatables.

S K Wilson1, M Cleves, J R Delk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared our experience with self-contained inflatable and multicomponent prostheses during similar intervals.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We followed 295 patients with self-contained prostheses and 1,026 with multicomponent inflatable devices for up to 8 years. Revision rates for mechanical failure, infection or patient dissatisfaction were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Multicomponent inflatable prostheses were superior with regard to mechanical reliability and patient satisfaction, with no differences in rate of infection. Self-contained prostheses were best replaced with the AMS 700CX device, thus avoiding aneurysm.
CONCLUSIONS: Self-contained inflatable prostheses may be of limited value for the treatment of impotence. The AMS 700CX is the device of choice for replacement of explanted self-contained prostheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8627837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  7 in total

1.  The importance of psychosexual counselling in the re-establishment of organic and erotic functions after penile prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  F Pisano; M Falcone; A Abbona; M Oderda; F Soria; F Peraldo; F Marson; M Barale; C Fiorito; A Gurioli; B Frea; P Gontero
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  Satisfaction assessment with malleable prosthetic implant of Spectra (AMS) and Genesis (Coloplast) models.

Authors:  A R Casabé; N Sarotto; C Gutierrez; A J Bechara
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 3.  Surgical management of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Aaron J Milbank; Drogo K Montague
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Contemporary patient satisfaction rates for three-piece inflatable penile prostheses.

Authors:  Raymond M Bernal; Gerard D Henry
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-07-26

Review 5.  Prevention, identification, and management of post-operative penile implant complications of infection, hematoma, and device malfunction.

Authors:  Timothy K O'Rourke; Alexander Erbella; Yu Zhang; Matthew S Wosnitzer
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11

Review 6.  Penile prosthesis implant: scientific advances and technological innovations over the last four decades.

Authors:  Eric Chung
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-02

7.  Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses.

Authors:  Javier Romero Otero; César Rojas Cruz; Borja García Gómez; Joaquim Sarquella Geli; Jose Medina Polo; Eduard Ruiz Castañé; Alfredo Rodríguez Antolín
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.