Literature DB >> 8627415

Rod phototransduction in transgenic mice expressing a mutant opsin gene.

Y Goto1, N S Peachey, N E Ziroli, W H Seiple, C Gryczan, D R Pepperberg, M I Naash.   

Abstract

Rod-mediated electroretinograms (ERG's) were recorded from transgenic mice expressing a mouse opsin gene with three point mutations (V20G, P23H, and P27L; termed VPP mice) and from normal littermates. The leading edge of the alpha wave was analyzed in relation to a computational model of rod phototransduction [J. Physiol. 499, 719 (1992)], in which values for the maximum response (RmP3), transduction gain (S), and transduction delay (td) are derived from alpha-wave data. VPP mice exhibited an age-related decrease in RmP3. This decrease was consistent with reductions in the number of rod photoreceptors and in the length of rod outer segments observed in previous histological studies of the VPP retina. Values of S determined for the VPP mice were within the normal range, consistent with a normal amplification of the visual signal in VPP rods. At high stimulus intensities, both normal and VPP mice exhibited a decrease in S, which may reflect depletion of a phototransduction substrate at these stimulus levels. We examined the recovery of the alpha wave after a bright conditioning flash by measuring the rod alpha-wave response to a probe flash presented at varying times after the conditioning stimulus. In both normal and VPP mice a fourfold (0.6-log-unit) increase in conditioning stimulus intensity increased both T50%, the period required for half-maximal recovery, and tau, the exponential time constant describing recovery. However, the increases in T50% and tau were significantly greater in VPP mice, indicating an abnormally slow recovery of the flash response in VPP rods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8627415     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.13.000577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  25 in total

1.  Electroretinographic determination of human rod flash response in vivo.

Authors:  D R Pepperberg; D G Birch; D C Hood
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.600

2.  Time course of the flash response of dark- and light-adapted human rod photoreceptors derived from the electroretinogram.

Authors:  C Friedburg; M M Thomas; T D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Development of receptoral responses in pigmented and albino guinea-pigs (Cavia porcellus).

Authors:  B V Bui; A J Vingrys
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 4.  Light and inherited retinal degeneration.

Authors:  D M Paskowitz; M M LaVail; J L Duncan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05-17       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  In vitro analysis of ribozyme-mediated knockdown of an ADRP associated rhodopsin mutation.

Authors:  Dibyendu Chakraborty; Patrick Whalen; Alfred S Lewin; Muna I Naash
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.622

6.  Preconditioning-induced protection of photoreceptors requires activation of the signal-transducing receptor gp130 in photoreceptors.

Authors:  Yumi Ueki; Yun-Zheng Le; Srinivas Chollangi; Werner Muller; John D Ash
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Retinal structure and function in an animal model that replicates the biochemical hallmarks of desmosterolosis.

Authors:  S J Fliesler; M J Richards; C Miller; N S Peachey; R J Cenedella
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.996

8.  Misregulation of rhodopsin phosphorylation and dephosphorylation found in P23H rat retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Saito; Hiroshi Ohguro; Ikuyo Ohguro; Noriyuki Sato; Futoshi Ishikawa; Hitoshi Yamazaki; Tomomi Metoki; Tadashi Ito; Mitsuru Nakazawa
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12

9.  High levels of retinal docosahexaenoic acid do not protect photoreceptor degeneration in VPP transgenic mice.

Authors:  Feng Li; Lea D Marchette; Richard S Brush; Michael H Elliott; Kimberly R Davis; Ashley G Anderson; Robert E Anderson
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 2.367

10.  An adaptive ERG technique to measure normal and altered dark adaptation in the mouse.

Authors:  Paul J DeMarco; Yoshiaki Katagiri; Volker Enzmann; Henry J Kaplan; Maureen A McCall
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 2.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.