Literature DB >> 8626169

Analysis of forces and moments in arch guided molar protraction using Class I and Class II elastics. An in-vitro study.

H A Schumacher1, C Bourauel, D Drescher.   

Abstract

The use of class I and II elastics in arch guided tooth movement of the lower molars belongs to the proven clinical methods to achieve space closure even though risks are present. The vertical force component of class II elastics tends to interact with the sagittal force and thus the vertical force may change the desired sagittal force and movement direction. The objective of the study presented here was to investigate friction behavior and the movement dynamics of the arch guided protraction of the lower first molar being acted on by differing class I and class II elastic band geometries. The influence of class I and class II elastics at different force levels (1 N and 2 N) were studied. The pattern of the force line varied in the area of angulation from 0 degree to 40 degrees relative to the arch plane. The orthodontic measurement and simulation system (OMSS) was employed to determine force loss due to friction and to analyze side effects. In the arch guided mesialization of the lower first molar, the vertical component of class II elastics induces a minor force loss in comparison with class I elastics. This holds, however, only for the lower 1 N force level. When employing class II bands at a greater force level and with increased angulation, relatively greater force loss and increased side effects, such as extrusion and mesial tipping of the first molar, occur.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8626169     DOI: 10.1007/bf02189042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  14 in total

1.  An experimental apparatus for the simulation of three-dimensional movements in orthodontics.

Authors:  C Bourauel; D Drescher; M Thier
Journal:  J Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-09

2.  [The effect of physiological tooth mobility on the friction between the bracket and the arch].

Authors:  P Jost-Brinkmann; R R Miethke
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1991-04

3.  Frictional forces between bracket and arch wire.

Authors:  D Drescher; C Bourauel; H A Schumacher
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  [Orthodontic measuring and simulating systems (OMSS) for the static and dynamic analysis of tooth movement].

Authors:  D Drescher; C Bourauel; M Thier
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1991-06

5.  [The effect of the ligature on the friction between bracket and arch].

Authors:  H A Schumacher; C Bourauel; D Drescher
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1990-04

6.  Frictional forces in fixed appliances.

Authors:  D C Tidy
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  [Materials technology research on the problem of friction between bracket and arch].

Authors:  D Drescher; W Laaser; H A Schumacher
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1989-08

8.  A comparison of frictional forces during simulated canine retraction of a continuous edgewise arch wire.

Authors:  L D Garner; W W Allai; B K Moore
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  [Frictional forces and movement dynamics in the mesialization of the second molar after the extraction of the sixth-year molar. An in-vitro study].

Authors:  H A Schumacher; C Bourauel; D Drescher
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1993-12

10.  A comparative study of frictional resistances between orthodontic bracket and arch wire.

Authors:  C A Frank; R J Nikolai
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1980-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Indirect miniscrew anchorage: biomechanical loading of the dental anchorage during mandibular molar protraction-an FEM analysis.

Authors:  Christof Holberg; Philipp Winterhalder; Nikola Holberg; Andrea Wichelhaus; Ingrid Rudzki-Janson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Prediction of optimal bending angles of a running loop to achieve bodily protraction of a molar using the finite element method.

Authors:  Woon-Kuk Ryu; Jae Hyun Park; Kiyoshi Tai; Yukio Kojima; Youngjoo Lee; Jong-Moon Chae
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 1.372

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.