Literature DB >> 8626137

Final results of a phase II chemoradiation protocol for locally advanced cervical cancer: RTOG 85-15.

M John1, M Flam, R Caplan, M Rotman, J Quivey, A Steinfeld, A Russell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The lack of improved cure rates for advanced cervical cancer after three decades of megavoltage radiotherapy (RT) has prompted continued efforts in improved treatment delivery. Concurrent chemoradiation (CR) is one of the several avenues being explored to improve these results.
METHODS: Sixty women with advanced cervical cancer (30 patients with unfavorable Stage IIB and 30 patients with Stages III and IVA) were treated with CR comprising of a combination of external and intracavitary RT delivering between 7000 to 7500 cGy total to point A and 5890 to 6015 cGy to point B along with one cycle of 5-FU and mitomycin C and a second cycle of 5-FU and cis-platinum.
RESULTS: Grade 3 and 4 RT-related toxicities were 15 and 3%, respectively. Chemotherapy-related Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were 9 and 2%, respectively. The 5-year survival for unfavorable Stage IIB patients was 48%; for Stages III and IVA it was 39%.
CONCLUSIONS: The toxicity of this particular CR regimen was acceptable and suggests that further qualitative and quantitative intensification of chemoradiation may be attempted. Retrospective comparisons with PCS studies and previous RTOG studies 79-20 and 80-05 suggest that this particular chemoradiation regimen may offer a modest survival advantage over RT alone for Stages III and IVA disease. A CR regimen with higher doses of radiotherapy and a greater number of active chemotherapeutic agents may yet result in acceptable toxicity and further improve cure rates in advanced and poor prognostic featured cervical cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8626137     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1996.0129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  5 in total

1.  Radiation therapy oncology group gynecologic oncology working group: comprehensive results.

Authors:  David K Gaffney; Anuja Jhingran; Lorraine Portelance; Akila Viswanathan; Tracey Schefter; Joanne Weidhaas; William Small
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.437

2.  Srinagarind Hospital experience in concurrent chemoradiation for 100 patients with stage IB2 to IVA uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Thumwadee Tangsiriwatthana; Bandit Chumworathayi; Pissamai Yuenyao; Sanguanchoke Luanratanakorn; Jeerichuda Pattamadilok
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-12-25

3.  A comparative planning study of step-and-shoot IMRT versus helical tomotherapy for whole-pelvis irradiation in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Imjai Chitapanarux; Ekkasit Tharavichitkul; Wannapa Nobnop; Somsak Wanwilairat; Roy Vongtama; Patrinee Traisathit
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Whole pelvic helical tomotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: technical implementation of IMRT with helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  Chen-Hsi Hsieh; Ming-Chow Wei; Hsing-Yi Lee; Sheng-Mou Hsiao; Chien-An Chen; Li-Ying Wang; Yen-Ping Hsieh; Tung-Hu Tsai; Yu-Jen Chen; Pei-Wei Shueng
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Novel approaches for concurrent irradiation in locally advanced cervical cancer: platinum combinations, non-platinum-containing regimens, and molecular targeted agents.

Authors:  Giannis Mountzios; Aspasia Soultati; Dimitrios Pectasides; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Christos A Papadimitriou
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-05-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.