Literature DB >> 8625462

Observation and prevention of an artefactual formation of oxidized DNA bases and nucleosides in the GC-EIMS method.

T Douki1, T Delatour, F Bianchini, J Cadet.   

Abstract

Gas chromatography coupled to electron impact mass spectrometry (GC-EIMS) analysis following hydrolysis of DNA is a widely used assay for the detection of oxidized nucleobases and nucleosides. However, evidence was recently provided for an oxidation of guanine residues of hydrolysed DNA during the silylation prior to GC-EIMS analysis. This reaction accounts for the overestimation of the yield of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine by GC-EIMS. In the present work, we showed that adenine, cytosine, thymine and thymidine also give rise to oxidized derivatives during the derivatization. This was inferred from the measurement of the amount of 5-formyluracil, 5-hydroxymethyluracil, 5-hydroxycytosine (5-OHCyt), 8-oxo-7,8-dihydroadenine (8-OxoAde) and 5-hydroxymethyl-2'-deoxyuridine (5-HMdUrd) in a series of experiments based on the use of purified bases and nucleosides. Isotopically labelled oxidized bases and 5-HMdUrd were used as internal standards to control the quantitative aspect of the silylation reaction. Support for an artefactual oxidation of hydrolysed DNA was provided by the comparison of the amount of 8-OxoAde and 5-OHCyt detected within native and gamma-irradiated DNA by HPLC-EC and GC-EIMS. To prevent the artefactual formation of oxidized bases during the silylation, an approach based on an HPLC prepurification was developed to remove the precursors of the oxidized bases measured in the DNA sample. The HPLC/GC-EIMS assay was successfully applied to the quantitation of 8-OxoAde and 5-OHCyt in calf thymus DNA. In addition, the detection of the dose-dependent formation of 5-HMdUrd in isolated DNA exposed to ionizing radiation was achieved using the same approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8625462     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/17.2.347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of the levels of 8-hydroxyguanine in DNA as measured by gas chromatography mass spectrometry following hydrolysis of DNA by Escherichia coli Fpg protein or formic acid.

Authors:  H Rodriguez; J Jurado; J Laval; M Dizdaroglu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  8-Hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine as a marker of oxidative DNA damage related to occupational and environmental exposures.

Authors:  A Pilger; H W Rüdiger
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Prenatal stress causes oxidative damage to mitochondrial DNA in hippocampus of offspring rats.

Authors:  Liang Song; Jianbin Zheng; Hui Li; Ning Jia; Zhirong Suo; Qing Cai; Zhuanli Bai; Daxin Cheng; Zhongliang Zhu
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.996

4.  Measurement of oxidized and methylated DNA bases by HPLC with electrochemical detection.

Authors:  H Kaur; B Halliwell
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Measurement of oxidative DNA damage by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: ethanethiol prevents artifactual generation of oxidized DNA bases.

Authors:  A Jenner; T G England; O I Aruoma; B Halliwell
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 6.  Radiation-mediated formation of complex damage to DNA: a chemical aspect overview.

Authors:  J-L Ravanat; J Breton; T Douki; D Gasparutto; A Grand; W Rachidi; S Sauvaigo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Comparison of negative and positive ion electrospray tandem mass spectrometry for the liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry analysis of oxidized deoxynucleosides.

Authors:  Y Hua; S B Wainhaus; Y Yang; L Shen; Y Xiong; X Xu; F Zhang; J L Bolton; R B van Breemen
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Free radicals and breast cancer.

Authors:  D C Malins
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Pyrimido[1,2-a]-purin-10(3H)-one, M1G, is less prone to artifact than base oxidation.

Authors:  Yo-Chan Jeong; Jun Nakamura; Patricia B Upton; James A Swenberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  Artifacts associated with the measurement of oxidized DNA bases.

Authors:  J Cadet; T Douki; J L Ravanat
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.