Literature DB >> 8625339

Capsules and suppositories of methadone for patients on high-dose opioids for cancer pain: clinical and economic considerations.

S Watanabe1, M Belzile, N Kuehn, J Hanson, E Bruera.   

Abstract

The dose ratio, analgesic efficacy, toxicity and cost of methadone for cancer pain were evaluated in a retrospective review of 50 consecutive patients treated on a Palliative Care Unit. Patients were switched from hydromorphone 267.7 +/- 178.8 mg sc per day to custom-made capsules (24) or suppositories (26) of methadone for reasons of uncontrolled pain (24), toxicity (8), both (15) or other (2). The change in opioid occurred over 2.5 +/- 3.6 days, with another 4.4 +/- 3.7 days required to reach stable methadone dose. The ratio of stable methadone dose to final hydromorphone dose was 1.07 +/- 0.9 (oral) and 1.88 +/- 1.27 (rectal) (p = 0.01). Visual analogue scores for pain intensity (0-100 mm) declined from 50.8 +/- 22 to 40 +/- 20 (p = 0.01). The most frequent toxicities were constipation (46), sedation (42) and nausea (18). Six patients developed respiratory depression. Total cost of treatment was Canadian $116.77 +/- 157.17 for methadone capsules and Canadian $105.34 +/- 146.35 for methadone suppositories, vs Canadian $3450.51 +/- 5098.58 (p = 0.0001) for hydromorphone parenteral solution and Canadian $1801.21 +/- 2661.52 (p = 0.0001) for hydromorphone powder. It is concluded that methadone is an effective and inexpensive alternative in patients receiving high-dose opioids for cancer pain, at dose ratios much lower than recommended in the literature. The incidence of serious toxicities suggests that methadone should only be initiated in an adequately monitored setting by pain management experts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8625339     DOI: 10.1016/s0305-7372(96)90075-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev        ISSN: 0305-7372            Impact factor:   12.111


  7 in total

1.  Methadone initiation and rotation in the outpatient setting for patients with cancer pain.

Authors:  Henrique A Parsons; Maxine de la Cruz; Badi El Osta; Zhijun Li; Bianca Calderon; J Lynn Palmer; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Opioid and Nonopioid Therapy in Cancer Pain: The Traditional and the New.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  1999

3.  Bioavailabilities of rectal and oral methadone in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Ola Dale; Pamela Sheffels; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  The role of methadone in opioid rotation-a Polish experience.

Authors:  Wojciech Leppert
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-11-29       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Early switching from morphine to methadone is not improved by acetaminophen in the analgesia of oncologic patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Daniel I G Cubero; Auro del Giglio
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Methadone as first-line opioid treatment for cancer pain in a developing country palliative care unit.

Authors:  Gabriela P Peirano; Guillermo P Mammana; Mariela S Bertolino; Tania Pastrana; Gloria F Vega; Jorgelina Russo; Gabriela Varela; Ernesto Vignaroli; Raúl Ruggiero; Arnaldo Armesto; Gabriela Camerano; Graciela Dran
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  The Use of Methadone in Pediatric Cancer Pain - A Retrospective Study from a Governmental Cancer Center in India.

Authors:  Gayatri Palat; Charlotte Algotsson; Spandana Rayala; Vikranth Haridass; Jayalatha Nethagani; Vineela Rapelli; Maria Gebre Medhin; Eva Brun; Mikael Segerlantz
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2021-02-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.