Gabriela P Peirano1, Guillermo P Mammana1, Mariela S Bertolino1, Tania Pastrana2, Gloria F Vega1, Jorgelina Russo1, Gabriela Varela1, Ernesto Vignaroli1, Raúl Ruggiero3, Arnaldo Armesto4, Gabriela Camerano3, Graciela Dran5. 1. Unidad de Cuidados Paliativos- Fundación Femeba, Hospital General de Agudos Dr. Enrique Tornú, Combatientes de Malvinas 3002, 1427, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 2. Palliative Medicine, University of Aachen, Aachen, Germany. 3. Laboratorio de Oncología Experimental, Instituto de Medicina Experimental IMEX-CONICET-Academia Nacional De Medicina, José Andrés Pacheco de Melo 3081. C1425AUM, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. 4. Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine-University of Buenos Aires, Paraguay 2155, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, C1121ABG, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 5. Laboratorio de Oncología Experimental, Instituto de Medicina Experimental IMEX-CONICET-Academia Nacional De Medicina, José Andrés Pacheco de Melo 3081. C1425AUM, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina. gcolodran@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The use of methadone for cancer pain is limited by the need of expertise and close titration due to variable half-life. Yet, it is a helpful palliative strategy in low-resources countries given its long-acting effect at low cost and worth additional study. Our aim was to describe the prescription and outcomes of methadone as a first-line treatment for cancer pain in a tertiary palliative care unit (PCU) in Argentina. METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records of patients with moderate to severe cancer pain seen at the PCU in 1-year period, who initiated strong opioids at the first consultation. Data collected during the first month of treatment included disease and pain characteristics, initial and final opioid type and dose and need for opioid rotation. RESULTS: Methadone was the most frequent opioid both at the initial and last assessment (71 and 66 % of the prescriptions). In all, treatment with strong opioids provided considerable decrease in pain intensity (p < 0.001) with low and stable opioid dose. Median and interquartile range (IR) of oral morphine equivalent daily dose (OMEDD) was 26 (16-32) and 39 (32-55) mg for initial and final assessments, respectively (p = 0.3). In patients initiated with methadone, the median (IR) daily methadone dose was 5 (4-6) mg at first and 7.5 (6-10) mg at final assessment, and the median (IR) index of opioid escalation was 0 (0-4) mg; (p < 0.05). Patients on methadone underwent less percentage of opioid rotation (15 versus 50 %; p < 0.001) and longer time to rotation (20.6 ± 4.4 versus 9.0 ± 2.7 days; p < 0.001) than patients on other opioids. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate the preference of methadone as first-line strong opioid treatment in a PCU, providing good pain relief at low doses with low need for rotation. Several considerations about the costs of strong opioids in the region are given.
PURPOSE: The use of methadone for cancer pain is limited by the need of expertise and close titration due to variable half-life. Yet, it is a helpful palliative strategy in low-resources countries given its long-acting effect at low cost and worth additional study. Our aim was to describe the prescription and outcomes of methadone as a first-line treatment for cancer pain in a tertiary palliative care unit (PCU) in Argentina. METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records of patients with moderate to severe cancer pain seen at the PCU in 1-year period, who initiated strong opioids at the first consultation. Data collected during the first month of treatment included disease and pain characteristics, initial and final opioid type and dose and need for opioid rotation. RESULTS:Methadone was the most frequent opioid both at the initial and last assessment (71 and 66 % of the prescriptions). In all, treatment with strong opioids provided considerable decrease in pain intensity (p < 0.001) with low and stable opioid dose. Median and interquartile range (IR) of oral morphine equivalent daily dose (OMEDD) was 26 (16-32) and 39 (32-55) mg for initial and final assessments, respectively (p = 0.3). In patients initiated with methadone, the median (IR) daily methadone dose was 5 (4-6) mg at first and 7.5 (6-10) mg at final assessment, and the median (IR) index of opioid escalation was 0 (0-4) mg; (p < 0.05). Patients on methadone underwent less percentage of opioid rotation (15 versus 50 %; p < 0.001) and longer time to rotation (20.6 ± 4.4 versus 9.0 ± 2.7 days; p < 0.001) than patients on other opioids. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate the preference of methadone as first-line strong opioid treatment in a PCU, providing good pain relief at low doses with low need for rotation. Several considerations about the costs of strong opioids in the region are given.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer pain; Developing countries; First-line strong opioid; Methadone
Authors: Augusto Caraceni; Geoffrey Hanks; Stein Kaasa; Michael I Bennett; Cinzia Brunelli; Nathan Cherny; Ola Dale; Franco De Conno; Marie Fallon; Magdi Hanna; Dagny Faksvåg Haugen; Gitte Juhl; Samuel King; Pål Klepstad; Eivor A Laugsand; Marco Maltoni; Sebastiano Mercadante; Maria Nabal; Alessandra Pigni; Lukas Radbruch; Colette Reid; Per Sjogren; Patrick C Stone; Davide Tassinari; Giovambattista Zeppetella Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Gayatri Palat; Charlotte Algotsson; Spandana Rayala; Vikranth Haridass; Jayalatha Nethagani; Vineela Rapelli; Maria Gebre Medhin; Eva Brun; Mikael Segerlantz Journal: Indian J Palliat Care Date: 2021-02-17
Authors: Gayatri Palat; Charlotte Algotsson; Spandana Rayala; Vikranth Haridass; Jayalatha Nethagani; Mustafa Ahmed; Vineela Rapelli; Maria Gebre Medhin; Eva Brun; Mikael Segerlantz Journal: Indian J Palliat Care Date: 2021-02-17