Literature DB >> 8623156

The effect of kidney size on cadaveric renal allograft outcome.

A M Miles1, N Sumrani, S John, M S Markell, D A Distant, V Maursky, J H Hong, E A Friedman, B Sommer.   

Abstract

Chronic rejection is the commonest cause of long-term renal allograft loss. Though immunologic factors are thought dominant in its pathogenesis, nonimmunologic factors, in particular, hyperfiltration damage related to reduced renal mass, have also been proposed as factors in the causation of chronic allograft rejection. We assessed the influence of renal size on graft survival and function in all cyclosporine-treated cadaver donor adult renal allograft recipients engrafted at a single center between June 1989 and July 1994, whose grafts functioned for > or = to 3 months (n=169). Patients were divided into 4 groups based on the ratio of kidney volume to recipient body surface area (volume/BSA) (ml/m2), and outcome in groups compared by methods including Cox's proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier analysis. No significant differences between groups existed for serum creatinine levels, presence of significant proteinuria, or 1- and 5-year graft survival. There was no correlation between volume/BSA and either serum creatinine or degree of proteinuria at 3, 6, 12, 36, and 60 months posttransplant. Volume/BSA was similar in patients with good or poor renal function (58 +/-21 vs. 56 +/- 28 ml/m2), with or without significant proteinuria (57 +/- 24 vs. 60 +/- 25 ml/m2) or in patients who lost their grafts to chronic rejection compared with those with stable allograft function (64 +/- 34 vs. 59 +/- 24 ml/m2). Volume/BSA was not a predictor of graft survival on multivariate regression. We conclude that donor kidney size has no apparent effect on cadaveric renal allograft outcome in the short and intermediate-term, suggesting that close matching of donor kidney size to recipient size is not presently indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8623156     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199603270-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  10 in total

1.  Kidney and recipient weight incompatibility reduces long-term graft survival.

Authors:  Magali Giral; Yohann Foucher; Georges Karam; Yann Labrune; Michelle Kessler; Bruno Hurault de Ligny; Mathias Büchler; François Bayle; Carole Meyer; Nathalie Trehet; Pascal Daguin; Karine Renaudin; Anne Moreau; Jean Paul Soulillou
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  CT-based renal volume and graft function after living-donor kidney transplantation: Is there a volume threshold to avoid?

Authors:  Jorge Dias; Jorge Malheiro; Manuela Almeida; Leonídio Dias; Miguel Silva-Ramos; La Salete Martins; Luís Xambre; António Castro-Henriques
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  The impact of donor and recipient weight incompatibility on renal transplant outcomes.

Authors:  Limy Wong; Aileen Counihan; Patrick O'Kelly; Donal J Sexton; Conall M O'Seaghdha; Colm Magee; Dilly Little; Peter J Conlon
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Glomerular hyperfiltration.

Authors:  Monica Cortinovis; Norberto Perico; Piero Ruggenenti; Andrea Remuzzi; Giuseppe Remuzzi
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 42.439

5.  Clinical implications for graft function of a new equation model for the ratio of living donor kidney volume to recipient body surface area.

Authors:  Chang Ki Lee; Young Eun Yoon; Kyung Hwa Choi; Seung Choul Yang; Joong Shik Lee; Dong Jin Joo; Kyu Ha Huh; Yu Seun Kim; Woong Kyu Han
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-12-10

6.  Donor Age, Donor-Recipient Size Mismatch, and Kidney Graft Survival.

Authors:  Fanny Lepeytre; Catherine Delmas-Frenette; Xun Zhang; Stéphanie Larivière-Beaudoin; Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze; Bethany J Foster; Héloïse Cardinal
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Prediction model of compensation for contralateral kidney after living-donor donation.

Authors:  Kenji Okumura; Shigeyoshi Yamanaga; Kosuke Tanaka; Kohei Kinoshita; Akari Kaba; Mika Fujii; Masatomo Ogata; Yuji Hidaka; Mariko Toyoda; Soichi Uekihara; Akira Miyata; Akito Inadome; Hiroshi Yokomizo
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Impact of adjusted kidney volume measured in the bench surgery on one-year renal function in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Flávio Vasconcelos Ordones; Pedro Ivo Rocchetti Pajolli; Rodrigo Guerra da Silva; Hamilto Akihissa Yamamoto; Fernando Fereira Gomes Filho; Paulo Roberto Kawano; João Luiz Amaro; Luis Gustavo Modelli de Andrade
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Impact of acute kidney injury on graft outcomes of deceased donor kidney transplantation: A nationwide registry-based matched cohort study in Korea.

Authors:  Jane Ha; Cheol Woong Jung; Sunkyu Choi; Myung-Gyu Kim; Jun Gyo Gwon; Joong Kyung Kim; Chan-Duck Kim; Ji Won Min; Jaeseok Yang; Curie Ahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Is Bigger Better? Living Donor Kidney Volume as Measured by the Donor CT Angiogram in Predicting Donor and Recipient eGFR after Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Chaudhry Adeel Ebad; David Brennan; Julio Chevarria; Mohammad Bin Hussein; Donal Sexton; Douglas Mulholland; Ciaran Doyle; Patrick O'Kelly; Yvonne Williams; Ruth Dunne; Conall O'Seaghdha; Dilly Little; Martina Morrin; Peter J Conlon
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2021-07-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.