Literature DB >> 8622300

Aortic valve replacement in patients aged eighty years and older: early and long-term results.

A Gehlot1, C J Mullany, D Ilstrup, H V Schaff, T A Orzulak, J J Morris, R C Daly.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We have studied 322 patients, 80 years of age or older, who underwent aortic valve replacement between June 1971 and December 1992. Two hundred six patients (64%) have had surgery since the end of 1985. Their mean age was 82.7 years (range 80 to 92 years). One hundred seventy-one (53%) were male and most (86%) were in New York Heart Association class III-IV. Fifty-seven patients (18%) required admission to the coronary care unit before the operation. One hundred seventy-nine patients (56%) underwent an urgent or emergency operation. Known cerebrovascular disease was present in 77 (24% of patients), aortic stenosis in 79%, aortic incompetence in 9%, and combined stenosis and incompetence in 12%. Associated procedures included bypass grafting in 139 (43%), mitral valve replacement/repair in 20 (6%), tricuspid valve repair in 6 (2%), and aortic annular enlargement in 38 (12%). Thirty patients (9.3%) were undergoing reoperation. Hospital mortality was 44 of 322 (13.7%). The median hospital stay was 11 days. On univariate analysis, significant predictors of hospital mortality were female sex, preoperative rest pain, New York Heart Association class III-IV, admission to the coronary care unit, heart failure, mitral valve disease, emergency/urgent operation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bypass grafting, valve size, peripheral vascular disease, and ejection fraction less than 0.35. On multivariate analysis the most important independent predictors of operative mortality were female gender (p = 0.0001), renal impairment (p = 0.001), bypass grafting (p = 0.005), ejection fraction less than 0.35 (p = 0.01), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.028). Age and year of operation did not influence mortality. Five-year survivals for all patients and for operative survivors were 60.2% +/- 3.2% and 70.3% +/- 3.4%, respectively. On univariate analysis, factors that adversely affected long-term survival were coronary bypass grafting (p = 0.007), more than two comorbidities (p = 0.02), male gender (p = 0.04), and ejection fraction less than 0.35 (p = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, no factor was consistently significant for long-term survival. At most recent clinical follow-up 85% were angina free and 82% were in class I-II. At least 92% of patients, both at 1 year and at most recent clinical follow-up, believed they had significantly benefited from the operation:
CONCLUSION: Risk factors for aortic valve replacement in octogenarians include female gender, unstable symptoms, poor ejection fraction, renal impairment, and bypass grafting. However, despite a hospital mortality higher than that reported for younger patients, the outlook for operative survivors is excellent, with good relief of symptoms and an expected survival normal for this particular age group. If possible, aortic valve replacement should be done before development of unstable symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8622300     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70379-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac valve surgery in the octogenarian.

Authors:  R Prêtre; M I Turina
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Transarterial aortic valve replacement with a self expanding stent in pigs.

Authors:  M Ferrari; H R Figulla; M Schlosser; I Tenner; I Frerichs; C Damm; V Guyenot; G S Werner; G Hellige
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Short-term and long-term mortality in very elderly patients admitted to an intensive care unit.

Authors:  S E de Rooij; A Govers; J C Korevaar; A Abu-Hanna; M Levi; E de Jonge
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Aortic and mitral valve replacement in an 83-year-old female. 3 years follow-up of 16 mm bileaflet valve at the aortic position.

Authors:  K Tanemoto; M Kuinose; Y Kanaoka; T Murakami; K Kuroki
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1998-09

5.  Surgery for aortic stenosis in severely symptomatic patients older than 80 years: experience in a single UK centre.

Authors:  T Gilbert; W Orr; A P Banning
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Quality of life before and after heart valve surgery is influenced by gender and type of valve.

Authors:  Marie-Christine Taillefer; Gilles Dupuis; Jean-François Hardy; Sylvie LeMay
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Adding coronary artery bypass grafting to aortic valve replacement increases operative mortality for elderly (70 years and older) patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Sasaki; Hidekazu Hirai; Mitsuharu Hosono; Yasuyuki Bito; Atsushi Nakahira; Yasuo Suehiro; Daisuke Kaku; Yuko Okada; Shigefumi Suehiro
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-03-15

8.  Sex differences in risks of in-hospital and late outcomes after cardiac surgery: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Feng-Cheng Chang; Shao-Wei Chen; Yi-Hsin Chan; Chia-Pin Lin; Victor Chien-Chia Wu; Yu-Ting Cheng; Dong-Yi Chen; Kuo-Chun Hung; Pao-Hsien Chu; An-Hsun Chou
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.