PURPOSE: We have used identical treatment protocols for adults and children with small non-cleaved-cell lymphoma (SNCL) for many years and report here the results of two successive treatment regimens in these age groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients (39 adults and 33 children) were treated with protocol 77-04 between 1977 and 1985. All patients, except those with resected abdominal disease, received 15 cycles of a combination of cyclophosphamide (CTX), doxorubicin (ADR), prednisone (PRED), vincristine (VCR), high-dose methotrexate (MTX), and intrathecal (IT) therapy. Forty-one patients (20 adults and 21 children) were treated with protocol 89-C-41, which has been used since 1989. High-risk patients received four alternating cycles (with a total duration of 12 to 15 weeks) of an intensified version of protocol 77-04 without PRED (CODOX-M), and a new drug combination consisting of ifosfamide, etoposide, high-dose cytarabine (ara-C), and IT MTX (IVAC). Low-risk patients received three cycles of the CODOX-M regimen. High-risk patients were randomized to either receive or not receive granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). RESULTS:Event-free survival (EFS) in protocol 77-04 was 56% at 2 years and beyond. EFS in protocol 89-C-41 was 92% at 2 years and beyond. GM-CSF was associated with increased thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION:Adults and children with SNCL have a similar prognosis when treated with the same chemotherapy. EFS in high-risk patients has been markedly improved by including IVAC in protocol 89-C-41, and excellent results can be achieved with only four cycles of therapy. In protocol 89-C-41, GM-CSF was not beneficial.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: We have used identical treatment protocols for adults and children with small non-cleaved-cell lymphoma (SNCL) for many years and report here the results of two successive treatment regimens in these age groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients (39 adults and 33 children) were treated with protocol 77-04 between 1977 and 1985. All patients, except those with resected abdominal disease, received 15 cycles of a combination of cyclophosphamide (CTX), doxorubicin (ADR), prednisone (PRED), vincristine (VCR), high-dose methotrexate (MTX), and intrathecal (IT) therapy. Forty-one patients (20 adults and 21 children) were treated with protocol 89-C-41, which has been used since 1989. High-risk patients received four alternating cycles (with a total duration of 12 to 15 weeks) of an intensified version of protocol 77-04 without PRED (CODOX-M), and a new drug combination consisting of ifosfamide, etoposide, high-dose cytarabine (ara-C), and IT MTX (IVAC). Low-risk patients received three cycles of the CODOX-M regimen. High-risk patients were randomized to either receive or not receive granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). RESULTS: Event-free survival (EFS) in protocol 77-04 was 56% at 2 years and beyond. EFS in protocol 89-C-41 was 92% at 2 years and beyond. GM-CSF was associated with increased thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: Adults and children with SNCL have a similar prognosis when treated with the same chemotherapy. EFS in high-risk patients has been markedly improved by including IVAC in protocol 89-C-41, and excellent results can be achieved with only four cycles of therapy. In protocol 89-C-41, GM-CSF was not beneficial.
Authors: Christopher C Stanley; Kate D Westmoreland; Brett J Heimlich; Nader K El-Mallawany; Peter Wasswa; Idah Mtete; Mercy Butia; Salama Itimu; Mary Chasela; Mary Mtunda; Mary Chikasema; Victor Makwakwa; Bongani Kaimila; Edwards Kasonkanji; Fred Chimzimu; Coxcilly Kampani; Bal M Dhungel; Robert Krysiak; Nathan D Montgomery; Yuri Fedoriw; Nora E Rosenberg; N George Liomba; Satish Gopal Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: L Smyth; P V Browne; E Conneally; C Flynn; P Hayden; M Jeffers; D O'Brien; F Quinn; J Kelly; M Perera; G M Crotty; M Leahy; B Hennessy; F Jackson; M Ryan; E Vandenberghe Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Benny Lee; Ozge Goktepe; Kevin Hay; Joseph M Connors; Laurie H Sehn; Kerry J Savage; Tamara Shenkier; Richard Klasa; Alina Gerrie; Diego Villa Journal: Oncologist Date: 2014-02-25
Authors: Christopher D Carey; Daniel Gusenleitner; Bjoern Chapuy; Alexandra E Kovach; Michael J Kluk; Heather H Sun; Rachel E Crossland; Chris M Bacon; Vikki Rand; Paola Dal Cin; Long P Le; Donna Neuberg; Aliyah R Sohani; Margaret A Shipp; Stefano Monti; Scott J Rodig Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2014-11-07 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Wyndham H Wilson; Jacoline E C Bromberg; Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson; Seth M Steinberg; Lourdes Martin-Martin; Carmen Muñiz; Juan Manuel Sancho; Maria Dolores Caballero; Marjan A Davidis; Rik A Brooimans; Blanca Sanchez-Gonzalez; Antonio Salar; Eva González-Barca; Jose Maria Ribera; Margaret Shovlin; Armando Filie; Kieron Dunleavy; Thomas Mehrling; Michele Spina; Alberto Orfao Journal: Haematologica Date: 2014-04-11 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Stacey M Parker; Horatiu Olteanu; Peter VanTuinen; Colleen A Lawton; Christopher J Schultz; Kathleen K Christians; Timothy S Fenske Journal: Int J Hematol Date: 2009-11-25 Impact factor: 2.490