Literature DB >> 8620497

Factors influencing the pharmacokinetics, dosimetry, and diagnostic accuracy of radioimmunodetection and radioimmunotherapy of carcinoembryonic antigen-expressing tumors.

T M Behr1, R M Sharkey, M I Juweid, R M Dunn, Z Ying, C H Zhang, J A Siegel, D V Gold, D M Goldenberg.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine factors that may influence the pharmacokinetics, diagnostic accuracy, and dosimetry in radioimmunodetection and radioimmunotherapy with anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Data from 275 patients with CEA expressing tumors were analyzed retrospectively. Of these, 69 patients devoid of human antimouse antibody (i.e., 31 colorectal, 9 lung, 7 breast, 4 ovarian, 6 pancreatic, 9 medullary thyroid, 1 gallbladder, and 1 salivary gland cancer, and 1 primary tumor of unknown origin) underwent a low-protein-dose diagnostic study (0.3-2.6 mg of protein; 6.8-28.8 mCi 131I-labeled IgG or fragments), followed within 4 weeks by a high-protein-dose therapy injection (4.0-27.5 mg of protein; 29.8-238.9 mCi). The anti-CEA antibodies NP-4 (Ka=10(8)M-1) and MN-14 (ka=10(9)M-1) were used. Plasma clearance, the molecular composition of radioactivity in the plasma, and the cumulated activity in organs and tumors were determined. Radiation doses were derived from the Medical Internal Radiation Dose scheme. At a low-protein dose and over a similar range of plasma CEA, a significantly higher percentage of MN-14 than of NP-4 was complexed with circulating CEA, consistent with its higher affinity. Complexation was reduced with increasing protein doses. However, the targeting sensitivity was not affected. Profound differences were found in the clearance of the antibody between different types of cancer. Colorectal cancer patients cleared the antibody significantly faster from blood (T1/2=17.6+/-12.6 versus 44.2 +/- 23.7 h) and whole body (t1/2= 53.2 +/- 30.1 versus 114.6+/-59.7 h) than all other tumor types (P <0.001). Consequently, significantly lower red marrow (2.1 +/- 1.0 cGy/mCi versus 4.3 +/- 1.6 cGy/mCi) and whole-body doses (0.5 +/- 0.3 cGy/mCi versus 1.0 +/- 0.4 cGy/mCi) were seen in colorectal cancer patients as compared with other tumor types (P < 0.001). This clearance is probably due to hepatic metabolism of the immune complexes. Clearance rates were especially high in patients with colorectal cancer having large liver metastases and elevated liver enzymes (rapid hepatic clearance with liberation of free I-). In contrast, a disease-stage and plasma CEA-matched cohort of colorectal cancer patients, examined with the 131 I-labeled anti-colon-specific antigen p mAb Mu-9, showed normal murine IgG pharmacokinetics (n=22;3 of them compared intraindividually to MN-14). Only in colorectal cancer patients did complexes between mAb and CEA tend to clear rapidly, whereas Mu-9 had normal kinetics in these patients. This suggests that different CEA-expressing cancer types may produce heterogeneous CEA molecules and that the variability in mAb clearance is due to varying clearance rates of these different circulating CEA subspecies. Disease-related alterations in antibody metabolism are unlikely, given that only anti-CEA antibodies exhibit this phenomenon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8620497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  6 in total

1.  Tumour targeting of humanised cross-linked divalent-Fab' antibody fragments: a clinical phase I/II study.

Authors:  J L Casey; M P Napier; D J King; R B Pedley; L C Chaplin; N Weir; L Skelton; A J Green; L D Hope-Stone; G T Yarranton; R H J Begent
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-05-06       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  89Zr-labeled CEA-targeted IL-2 variant immunocytokine in patients with solid tumors: CEA-mediated tumor accumulation and role of IL-2 receptor-binding.

Authors:  Emilie M J van Brummelen; Marc C Huisman; Linda J de Wit-van der Veen; Tapan K Nayak; Marcel P M Stokkel; Emma R Mulder; Otto S Hoekstra; Danielle J Vugts; Guus A M S Van Dongen; Henk M Verheul; Stefan Evers; Jean J L Tessier; Jose Saro; Jan H M Schellens; C Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-05-15

Review 3.  Recent advances of bispecific antibodies in solid tumors.

Authors:  Shengnan Yu; Anping Li; Qian Liu; Xun Yuan; Hanxiao Xu; Dechao Jiao; Richard G Pestell; Xinwei Han; Kongming Wu
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 17.388

4.  Ex Vivo Assessment of Tumor-Targeting Fluorescent Tracers for Image-Guided Surgery.

Authors:  Fortuné M K Elekonawo; Jan Marie de Gooyer; Desirée L Bos; David M Goldenberg; Otto C Boerman; Lodewijk A A Brosens; Andreas J A Bremers; Johannes H W de Wilt; Mark Rijpkema
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Prognostic value of postoperative CEA clearance in rectal cancer patients with high preoperative CEA levels.

Authors:  Jeong Yeon Kim; Nam Kyu Kim; Seung Kook Sohn; Yong Wan Kim; Kim Jin Soo Kim; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Chang Hwan Cho
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Prognostic significance of the decreased rate of perioperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen level in the patients with colon cancer after a curative resection.

Authors:  Tae Doo Jung; Jong Han Yoo; Min Jae Lee; Ha Kyung Park; Jae Ho Shin; Min Sung An; Tae Kwun Ha; Kwang Hee Kim; Ki Beom Bae; Tae Hyeon Kim; Chang Soo Choi; Min Kyung Oh; Kwan Hee Hong
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2013-06-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.