Literature DB >> 7097966

Attitudes toward clinical trials among patients and the public.

B R Cassileth, E J Lusk, D S Miller, S Hurwitz.   

Abstract

Attitudes toward clinical research, the focus of recent and damaging media attention, were assessed through questionnaires completed anonymously by 104 patients with cancer, 84 cardiology patients, and 107 members of the general public. Responses differed neither by subgroup nor by demographic variables. Data are therefore reported on the total population of 295 subjects. Most respondents (71%) believed that patients should serve as research subjects. In support of this belief, the majority cited potential benefit ot others and the opportunity to increase scientific knowledge, but a different bias emerged when they were asked about their own potential participation. This study shows that diverse respondents view clinical trials as important, ethical, and as a means of attaining superior clinical care. Major importance is attributed to making contributions to medical knowledge and to helping future patients. Contrasts are noted in patients' views of their own treatments v treatments of "'hypothetical others."

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7097966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  51 in total

1.  Clinical research in the private office setting--ethical issues.

Authors:  Alan R Fleischman; Jason E Klein
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2002

Review 2.  The promise of empirical research in the study of informed consent theory and practice.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Marie Caputo; Christopher Burant
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2004-03

3.  Willingness of subjects with thought disorder to participate in research.

Authors:  Philip J Candilis; Cynthia M A Geppert; Kenneth E Fletcher; Charles W Lidz; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 4.  Request for Treatment: the evolution of consent.

Authors:  Kayvan Shokrollahi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  The ethics of randomised controlled trials from the perspectives of patients, the public, and healthcare professionals.

Authors:  S J Edwards; R J Lilford; J Hewison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

6.  The Role of Clinical Trial Participation in Cancer Research: Barriers, Evidence, and Strategies.

Authors:  Joseph M Unger; Elise Cook; Eric Tai; Archie Bleyer
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2016

7.  Application of best practice approaches for designing decision support tools: the preparatory education about clinical trials (PRE-ACT) study.

Authors:  Linda Fleisher; Dominique G Ruggieri; Suzanne M Miller; Sharon Manne; Terrance Albrecht; Joanne Buzaglo; Michael A Collins; Michael Katz; Tyler G Kinzy; Tasnuva Liu; Cheri Manning; Ellen Specker Charap; Jennifer Millard; Dawn M Miller; David Poole; Stephanie Raivitch; Nancy Roach; Eric A Ross; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2014-04-21

8.  Informed consent, parental awareness, and reasons for participating in a randomised controlled study.

Authors:  M van Stuijvenberg; M H Suur; S de Vos; G C Tjiang; E W Steyerberg; G Derksen-Lubsen; H A Moll
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  K Featherstone; J L Donovan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

10.  Balancing high accrual and ethical recruitment in paediatric oncology: a qualitative study of the 'look and feel' of clinical trial discussions.

Authors:  Lucie M T Byrne-Davis; Peter Salmon; Katja Gravenhorst; Tim O B Eden; Bridget Young
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.