Literature DB >> 8615326

Technology advancements in hearing protection circa 1995: active noise reduction, frequency/amplitude-sensitivity, and uniform attenuation.

J G Casali1, E H Berger.   

Abstract

Conventional hearing protection devices represent a mature technology that has been widely used since the late 1950s. When worn consistently and correctly such devices can provide suitable hearing protection in many, if not most noise-hazardous or aurally annoying situations. However, such devices have often been implicated in compromised auditory perception, degraded signal detection, and reduced speech communication abilities. In some instances this can create hazards for the wearer, or at the very least, resistance to use by those in need of hearing protection. Recent technological developments have been used to augment hearing protectors in an attempt to alleviate these problems for the user while providing adequate attenuation. Operational characteristics, design alternatives, performance data, and applications for active noise reduction, active sound transmission, frequency selectively, adjustable attenuation, amplitude sensitivity, and uniform attenuation features in hearing protectors are discussed, and recommendations are provided.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8615326     DOI: 10.1080/15428119691015115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J        ISSN: 0002-8894


  4 in total

1.  Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M E Ravicz; J R Melcher; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of Active and Passive Hearing Protection Devices on Sound Source Localization, Speech Recognition, and Tone Detection.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Brianne T Beemer; Nathaniel T Greene; Theodore Argo; G Douglas Meegan; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Comparison of speech intelligibility measures for an electronic amplifying earmuff and an identical passive attenuation device.

Authors:  David C Byrne; Catherine V Palmer
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2012-02-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.