Literature DB >> 8613845

Posterior instrumentation of the unstable cervicothoracic spine.

J R Chapman1, P A Anderson, C Pepin, S Toomey, D W Newell, M S Grady.   

Abstract

Fractures, tumors, and other causes of instability at the cervicothoracic junction pose diagnostic and treatment challenges. The authors report on 23 patients with instability of the cervicothoracic region, which was treated with posterior plate fixation and fusion between the lower cervical and upper thoracic spine. During operation AO reconstruction plates with 8- or 12-mm hole spacing were affixed to the spine using screws in the cervical lateral masses and the thoracic pedicles. Postoperative immobilization consisted of the patient's wearing a simple external brace for 2 months. The following parameters were analyzed during the pre- and postoperative treatment period: neurological status, spine anatomy and reconstruction, and complications. Follow up consisted of clinical and radiographic examinations (mean duration of follow up, 15.4 months; range, 6-41 months). No neurovascular or pulmonary complications arose from surgery. All patients achieved a solid arthrodesis based on flexion-extension radiographs. There was no significant change in angulation during the postoperative period, but one patient had an increase in translation that was not clinically significant. There were no hardware complications that required reoperation. One patient requested hardware removal in hopes of reducing postoperative pain in the cervicothoracic region. One postoperative wound infection required debridement but not hardware removal. The authors conclude that posterior plate fixation is a satisfactory method of treatment of cervicothoracic instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8613845     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1996.84.4.0552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  6 in total

1.  The use of pedicle screw-rod system for the posterior fixation in cervico-thoracic junction.

Authors:  Wonik Cho; Ahmed Shawky Eid; Ung-Kyu Chang
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-07-31

2.  Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study.

Authors:  Jae Taek Hong; Takigawa Tomoyuki; Ashish Jain; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Nozomu Inoue; Howard S An
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Axial neck pain after cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Chul Bum Cho; Chung Kee Chough; Jong Yang Oh; Hae Kwan Park; Kyung Jin Lee; Hyoung Kyun Rha
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-02-28

4.  Spine surgery in neurological lesions of the cervicothoracic junction: multicentric experience on 33 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Alessandro Ramieri; Maurizio Domenicucci; Pasqualino Ciappetta; Paolo Cellocco; Antonino Raco; Giuseppe Costanzo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Traumatic Fracture: Dislocation of Cervicothoracic Junction-Grand Round Presentation of C7-T1 Instabilities and Different Instrumentation Techniques.

Authors:  Mohammad A Alsofyani; Soufiane Ghailane; Sultan Alsalmi; Sreenath Jakinapally; Louis Boissière; Ibrahim Obeid; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2020-07-01

6.  The change of adjacent segment and sagittal balance after thoracolumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Kang San Kim; Hyung Sik Hwang; Je Hoon Jeong; Seung Myung Moon; Sun Kil Choi; Sung Min Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-11-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.