Literature DB >> 21404033

Spine surgery in neurological lesions of the cervicothoracic junction: multicentric experience on 33 consecutive cases.

Alessandro Ramieri1, Maurizio Domenicucci, Pasqualino Ciappetta, Paolo Cellocco, Antonino Raco, Giuseppe Costanzo.   

Abstract

Surgical treatment of the cervico-thoracic junction (CTJ) in the spine require special evaluation due to the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of this spinal section. The transitional zone between the mobile cervical and the relatively rigid thoracic spine can be the site of serious unstable traumas or neoplastic lesions. Frequently, injury is associated with neurological impairment due to the small caliber of the spinal canal and/or spinal cord vascular insufficiency. The authors considered 33 neurologic lesions of the CTJ (21 traumas, 10 tumors, 2 infections) treated by means of decompression, fixation, and fusion by different type of instrumentation. Surgical procedure was posterior in 26 cases, anterior in 1 and combined in 6. Major general complications were not found in patients undergoing anterior approach. Biomechanical failure was found in two patients operated by T1 body replacement and C7-T2 anterior plate. Serious cardio-respiratory complications were related to 2 polytrauma patients who underwent posterior surgery. Follow-up evaluation showed spinal stability and fusion in 88% of cases, improvement of the neurological deficits in 42% (19% improved to ASIA E), no or only occasional pain in 75% of patients. In the experience, recovery of spinal realignment and stability is essential to avoid disability due to back pain in trauma patients. In spinal tumors, back pain was related to local recurrence. Neurological outcomes can be unsatisfactory due to the initial serious impairment. There is no type of instrumentation more effective than other. In each single lesion, the most suitable type of instrumentation should be employed, considering morphology, biomechanics, and familiarity of the spinal surgeon with different implants and constructs. Therefore, we prefer to use posterior cervicothoracic fixation in T1 lesions with involvement of the vertebral body and subsequently replace the body with cage without anterior stabilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21404033      PMCID: PMC3087034          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1748-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  37 in total

1.  Anatomy of the cervicothoracic junction: a study of cadaveric dissection, cryomicrotomy, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  H S An; J J Wise; R Xu
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1999-12

2.  Posterior stabilization at the cervicothoracic junction: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Kreshak; Daniel H Kim; Derek P Lindsey; Andrew C Kam; Manohar M Panjabi; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Anterior approach to the cervicothoracic junction by unilateral or bilateral manubriotomy. A report of five cases.

Authors:  Keith D K Luk; Kenneth M C Cheung; John C Y Leong
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Managing disorders of the cervicothoracic junction.

Authors:  Scott D Daffner; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2002-06

5.  Posterior cervicothoracic instrumentation in spine tumors.

Authors:  Christian Mazel; E Hoffmann; P Antonietti; D Grunenwald; M Henry; J Williams
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 6.  Surgical treatment of tumors involving the cervicothoracic junction.

Authors:  Hoang Le; Raju Balabhadra; Jon Park; Daniel Kim
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 7.  The cervicothoracic junction.

Authors:  Vincent Y Wang; Dean Chou
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.509

8.  Minimally invasive endoscopic approach to the cervicothoracic junction for vertebral metastases: report of two cases.

Authors:  J C Le Huec; E Lesprit; J P Guibaud; N Gangnet; S Aunoble
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Results and risk factors for anterior cervicothoracic junction surgery.

Authors:  J A Boockvar; M F Philips; A E Telfeian; D M O'Rourke; P J Marcotte
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Posterior stabilisation of a malignant cervico-thoracic vertebral bone defect.

Authors:  Benjamin Ulmar; Balkan Cakir; Klaus Huch; Wolfhart Puhl; Marcus Richter
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.500

View more
  7 in total

1.  Neurological L5 burst fracture: posterior decompression and lordotic fixation as treatment of choice.

Authors:  Alessandro Ramieri; Maurizio Domenicucci; Paolo Cellocco; Antonino Raco; Giuseppe Costanzo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Characteristics of deformity surgery in patients with severe and rigid cervical kyphosis (CK): results of the CSRS-Europe multi-centre study project.

Authors:  H Koller; C Ames; H Mehdian; R Bartels; R Ferch; V Deriven; H Toyone; C Shaffrey; J Smith; W Hitzl; J Schröder; Yohan Robinson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  An RCT study on the feasibility of anterior transpedicular screw fixation in the cervicothoracic junction.

Authors:  Liujun Zhao; Jinjiong Hong; Meghan E Wandtke; Rongming Xu; Weihu Ma; Weiyu Jiang; Yongjie Gu; Jianqing Chen; Liran Wang; Jiayong Liu; Nabil A Ebraheim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of therapeutic effects of anterior decompression and posterior decompression on thoracolumbar spine fracture complicated with spinal nerve injury.

Authors:  Hongxun Cui; Jiayi Guo; Lei Yang; Yanxing Guo; Malong Guo
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  Radiological anatomy of the C7 vertebra: Clinical implications in spine surgery.

Authors:  Fatih Keskin; Fatih Erdi; Alaaddin Nayman; Ozan Babaoglu; Kalkan Erdal; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

6.  C2 quad-screws facilitate 4-rod fixation across the cervico-thoracic junction.

Authors:  Clarke I Cady-McCrea; Michael A Galgano
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-02-03

7.  Surgical treatment indications and outcomes in patients with spinal metastases in the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ).

Authors:  Zemin Li; Houqing Long; Rui Guo; Jinghui Xu; Xiaobo Wang; Xing Cheng; Yangliang Huang; Fobao Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.