Literature DB >> 8613717

Transduction and adaptation in sensory receptor cells.

V Torre1, J F Ashmore, T D Lamb, A Menini.   

Abstract

Sensory transduction shares common features in widely different sensory modalities. The purpose of this article is to examine the similarities and differences in the underlying mechanisms of transduction in the sensory receptor cells for vision, olfaction, and hearing. One of the major differences between the systems relates to the nature of the stimulus. In both the visual and olfactory systems a quantal mechanism of detection is possible, because the absorption of a photon or the binding of an odorant molecule provides an energy change significantly greater than the thermal noise in the receptor molecule. In hearing, on the other hand, the energy of a phonon is far lower, and detection occurs by a "classical" mechanism. For vertebrate photoreceptors and olfactory receptor cells, sensory transduction employs a G protein cascade that is remarkably similar in the two cases, and that is closely homologous to other G protein signaling cascades. For auditory and vestibular hair cells, transduction operates via a mechanism of direct coupling of the stimulus to ion channels, in a manner reminiscent of the direct gating of post-synaptic ion channels in various synaptic mechanisms. The three classes of sensory receptor cell share similarities in their mechanisms of adaptation, and it appears in each case that cytoplasmic calcium concentration plays a major role in adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8613717      PMCID: PMC6577959     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  38 in total

1.  Olfactory adaptation depends on the Trp Ca2+ channel in Drosophila.

Authors:  K F Störtkuhl; B T Hovemann; J R Carlson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Expression of the P2X(2) receptor subunit of the ATP-gated ion channel in the cochlea: implications for sound transduction and auditory neurotransmission.

Authors:  G D Housley; R Kanjhan; N P Raybould; D Greenwood; S G Salih; L Järlebark; L D Burton; V C Setz; M B Cannell; C Soeller; D L Christie; S Usami; A Matsubara; H Yoshie; A F Ryan; P R Thorne
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Adaptation of the odour-induced response in frog olfactory receptor cells.

Authors:  J Reisert; H R Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  A simple mathematical model of second-messenger mediated slow excitatory postsynaptic potentials.

Authors:  P P Bertrand; E A Thomas; W A Kunze; J C Bornstein
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Ca2+-activated K+ currents regulate odor adaptation by modulating spike encoding of olfactory receptor cells.

Authors:  Fusao Kawai
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Role of guanylyl cyclase modulation in mouse cone phototransduction.

Authors:  Keisuke Sakurai; Jeannie Chen; Vladimir J Kefalov
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The role of steady phosphodiesterase activity in the kinetics and sensitivity of the light-adapted salamander rod photoresponse.

Authors:  S Nikonov; T D Lamb; E N Pugh
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  A dynamical feedback model for adaptation in the olfactory transduction pathway.

Authors:  Giovanna De Palo; Anna Boccaccio; Andrew Miri; Anna Menini; Claudio Altafini
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Fold-change detection and scalar symmetry of sensory input fields.

Authors:  Oren Shoval; Lea Goentoro; Yuval Hart; Avi Mayo; Eduardo Sontag; Uri Alon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Incorporating spike-rate adaptation into a rate code in mathematical and biological neurons.

Authors:  Bridget N Ralston; Lucas Q Flagg; Eric Faggin; John T Birmingham
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.