Literature DB >> 20729472

Fold-change detection and scalar symmetry of sensory input fields.

Oren Shoval1, Lea Goentoro, Yuval Hart, Avi Mayo, Eduardo Sontag, Uri Alon.   

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that certain cellular sensory systems display fold-change detection (FCD): a response whose entire shape, including amplitude and duration, depends only on fold changes in input and not on absolute levels. Thus, a step change in input from, for example, level 1 to 2 gives precisely the same dynamical output as a step from level 2 to 4, because the steps have the same fold change. We ask what the benefit of FCD is and show that FCD is necessary and sufficient for sensory search to be independent of multiplying the input field by a scalar. Thus, the FCD search pattern depends only on the spatial profile of the input and not on its amplitude. Such scalar symmetry occurs in a wide range of sensory inputs, such as source strength multiplying diffusing/convecting chemical fields sensed in chemotaxis, ambient light multiplying the contrast field in vision, and protein concentrations multiplying the output in cellular signaling systems. Furthermore, we show that FCD entails two features found across sensory systems, exact adaptation and Weber's law, but that these two features are not sufficient for FCD. Finally, we present a wide class of mechanisms that have FCD, including certain nonlinear feedback and feed-forward loops. We find that bacterial chemotaxis displays feedback within the present class and hence, is expected to show FCD. This can explain experiments in which chemotaxis searches are insensitive to attractant source levels. This study, thus, suggests a connection between properties of biological sensory systems and scalar symmetry stemming from physical properties of their input fields.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20729472      PMCID: PMC2936624          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1002352107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  42 in total

Review 1.  Adaptation in vertebrate photoreceptors.

Authors:  G L Fain; H R Matthews; M C Cornwall; Y Koutalos
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks.

Authors:  R Milo; S Shen-Orr; S Itzkovitz; N Kashtan; D Chklovskii; U Alon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL.

Authors:  J MONOD; J WYMAN; J P CHANGEUX
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1965-05       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  Changes in reaction time and search time with background luminance in the mesopic range.

Authors:  H C Walkey; J A Harlow; J L Barbur
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Bacterial strategies for chemotaxis response.

Authors:  Antonio Celani; Massimo Vergassola
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The extraordinarily rapid disappearance of entoptic images.

Authors:  D Coppola; D Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Reprogramming chemotaxis responses: sensory neurons define olfactory preferences in C. elegans.

Authors:  E R Troemel; B E Kimmel; C I Bargmann
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-10-17       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks.

Authors:  N Barkai; S Leibler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-26       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Model for chemotaxis.

Authors:  E F Keller; L A Segel
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 2.691

10.  Response properties of isolated mouse olfactory receptor cells.

Authors:  J Reisert; H R Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  89 in total

Review 1.  Responding to chemical gradients: bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Victor Sourjik; Ned S Wingreen
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 8.382

2.  Noninvasive inference of the molecular chemotactic response using bacterial trajectories.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Masson; Guillaume Voisinne; Jerome Wong-Ng; Antonio Celani; Massimo Vergassola
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Design principles of cell circuits with paradoxical components.

Authors:  Yuval Hart; Yaron E Antebi; Avraham E Mayo; Nir Friedman; Uri Alon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The cost of sensitive response and accurate adaptation in networks with an incoherent type-1 feed-forward loop.

Authors:  Ganhui Lan; Yuhai Tu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Intracellular encoding of spatiotemporal guidance cues in a self-organizing signaling system for chemotaxis in Dictyostelium cells.

Authors:  Tatsuo Shibata; Masatoshi Nishikawa; Satomi Matsuoka; Masahiro Ueda
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 6.  Understanding morphogenetic growth control -- lessons from flies.

Authors:  Ortrud Wartlick; Peer Mumcu; Frank Jülicher; Marcos Gonzalez-Gaitan
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 7.  Computational analysis of signaling patterns in single cells.

Authors:  Denise M Davis; Jeremy E Purvis
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 7.727

8.  Universal response-adaptation relation in bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Anna K Krembel; Silke Neumann; Victor Sourjik
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 9.  Communication codes in developmental signaling pathways.

Authors:  Pulin Li; Michael B Elowitz
Journal:  Development       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 10.  Quantitative modeling of bacterial chemotaxis: signal amplification and accurate adaptation.

Authors:  Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 12.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.