Literature DB >> 8613436

Usefulness of ultrasonography combined with conventional physical examination in mass screening for breast cancer: a retrospective study of Yamanashi Health Care Center results from 1989 to 1994.

H Okamoto1, T Ogawara, F Arihara, K Kobayashi, S Inoue, K Nagahori, M Yamamoto, T Sekikawa, Y Matsumoto.   

Abstract

We retrospectively analyzed the records for 34,474 women who participated in mass screening for breast cancer by physical examination with or without ultrasonography (US) at Yamanashi Health Care Center between April, 1989 and March, 1994 to evaluate the usefulness of US in mass screening. In one group (15,935 women) conventional physical examination with inspection and palpation alone had been performed, and in another (18,539 women) both conventional physical and US examinations were performed. Breast cancer was detected in 27 of the women (0.08% of the total group screened), 22 of whom were in the group examined by US; moreover, 16 of these 22 women had early breast cancer, which was a non-palpable tumor in 13. Half of the 22 women were examinees under the age of 50 years. Of the 22 tumors detected in the groups examined by US, 16 (73%) were early breast cancer. The overall detection of early breast cancer (0.09%) in the US group was significantly higher than that (0.01%) in the group examined by conventional methods (P < 0.05). Of the tumors detected in the US group, 59.1% were non-palpable. These results suggest that early and non-palpable breast cancer can be detected using US, and the incidence of detection of such tumors in women under the age 50 years is increased in mass screening including US examination. This examination is effective in mass screening for breast cancer, especially for early and non-palpable breast cancer tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8613436      PMCID: PMC5921096          DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1996.tb00223.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res        ISSN: 0910-5050


  26 in total

1.  Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial.

Authors:  S Shapiro
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Malignant breast masses detected only by ultrasound. A retrospective review.

Authors:  P B Gordon; S L Goldenberg
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The quality of mass screening for breast cancer by physical examination.

Authors:  T Morimoto; K Komaki; T Mori; M Sasa; K Ooshimo; H Miki; Y Monden; K Inui; N Saoyama; H Yoshida
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmö mammographic screening trial.

Authors:  I Andersson; K Aspegren; L Janzon; T Landberg; K Lindholm; F Linell; O Ljungberg; J Ranstam; B Sigfússon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-15

5.  The importance of mammographic screening relative to the treatment of women with carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  L J Solin; A Legorreta; D J Schultz; S Zatz; R L Goodman
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1994-04-11

6.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; W Black; R Harris; B K Rimer; S Shapiro
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  [Current problems in mass screening for breast cancer].

Authors:  T Morimoto; T Yamakawa; N Mitsuyama
Journal:  Gan To Kagaku Ryoho       Date:  1985-12

9.  High detection rate of breast cancer by mass screening using mammography in Japan.

Authors:  T Morimoto; M Sasa; T Yamaguchi; K Harada; Y Sagara
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1994-12

10.  Improved detection rate of early breast cancer in mass screening combined with mammography.

Authors:  N Ohuchi; K Yoshida; M Kimura; A Ouchi; S Kamioki; K Shiiba; N Matoba; S Kojima; K Takahashi; S Matsuno
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1993-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  A Case of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS:noncomedo type)Detected by Ultrasonography: Demonstration of Occult Multiple Foci.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1996-06-28       Impact factor: 4.239

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.