Literature DB >> 8610725

Asthma and gastroesophageal reflux: acid suppressive therapy improves asthma outcome.

S M Harding1, J E Richter, M R Guzzo, C A Schan, R W Alexander, L A Bradley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine (1) the appropriate omeprazole (Prilosec) dose required for adequate acid suppression in asthmatics with gastroesophageal reflux, (2) whether aggressive acid suppressive therapy of gastroesophageal reflux improves asthma outcome in asthmatics with gastroesophageal reflux, (3) the time course of asthma improvement, and (4) demographic, esophageal, or pulmonary predictors of a positive asthma response to antireflux therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty nonsmoking adult asthmatics with gastroesophageal reflux (asthma defined by American Thoracic Society criteria and reflux defined by symptoms and abnormal 24-hour esophageal pH testing) were recruited from the outpatient clinics of a 900-bed university hospital. Patients underwent baseline studies including a demographic questionnaire, esophageal manometry, dual-probe 24-hour esophageal pH test, barium esophogram, and pulmonary spirometry. During the 4-week pretherapy phase, patients recorded reflux and asthma symptom scores and peak expiratory flow rates (PEFs) upon awakening, 1 hour after dinner, and at bedtime. Patients began 20 mg/d omeprazole, and the dose was titrated until acid suppression was documented by 24-hour pH test. Patients remained on this acid suppressive dose for 3 months. Responders were identified by a priori definitions: asthma symptom reduction by >20% and/or PEF increase by >20%. Asthma symptom scores, PEF's baseline and posttherapy pulmonary spirometry were analyzed.
RESULTS: Twenty-two (73%) patients were asthma symptom and /or PEF responders: 20 (67%) were asthma symptom responders, and 6 (20%) were PEF responders. Responders reduced their asthma symptoms by 57% (P<0.001), improved their morning and night PEFs by 8% and 9% (both P <0.005), and had improvement in forced expiratory volume at 1 second (P <0.02), mean forced expiratory flow during the middle half (25% to 75%) of the forced vital capacity (P <0.04), and peak expiratory flow (P <0.01) with acid suppressive therapy. Mean acid suppressive dose of omeprazole was 27 mg/d (+/-2.2) with 27% (8) patients requiring more than 20 mg/d. The presence of regurgitation or excessive proximal esophageal reflux predicted asthma response with 100% sensitivity, 100% negative predictive value, specificity of 44% and a positive predictive value of 79%.
CONCLUSIONS: Acid suppressive therapy with omeprazole improves asthma symptoms and/or PEFs by >20% and improves pulmonary function in 73% of asthmatics with gastroesophageal reflux after 3 months of acid suppressive therapy. Many asthmatics (27%) required >20 mg/d of omeprazole to suppress acid. The presence of regurgitation and/or excessive proximal esophageal reflux predicts a positive asthma outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8610725     DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)89514-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  61 in total

1.  Asthma and gastroesophageal reflux: fundoplication decreases need for systemic corticosteroids.

Authors:  H Spivak; C D Smith; A Phichith; K Galloway; J P Waring; J G Hunter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Digestive system disorders: gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  D A Katzka
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-07

3.  Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-12

4.  Laparoscopic fundoplication is the treatment of choice for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Antagonist.

Authors:  J P Galmiche; F Zerbib
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Loss of alkalization in proximal esophagus: a new diagnostic paradigm for patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  Shahin Ayazi; Jeffrey A Hagen; Joerg Zehetner; Matt Lilley; Priyanka Wali; Florian Augustin; Arzu Oezcelik; Helen J Sohn; John C Lipham; Steven R Demeester; Tom R DeMeester
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Esophageal dysmotility and gastroesophageal reflux in intrinsic asthma.

Authors:  S Campo; S Morini; M A Re; D Monno; R Lorenzetti; B Moscatelli; E Bologna
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Proximal sensor data from routine dual-sensor esophageal pH monitoring is often inaccurate.

Authors:  Matt McCollough; Abdul Jabbar; Robert Cacchione; Jeff W Allen; Steve Harrell; John M Wo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Gastro-oesophageal reflux and bronchial asthma: current status and future directions.

Authors:  J L Mathew; M Singh; S K Mittal
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 9.  Symptom evaluation in reflux disease: workshop background, processes, terminology, recommendations, and discussion outputs.

Authors:  J Dent; D Armstrong; B Delaney; P Moayyedi; N J Talley; N Vakil
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Neurogenic airway inflammation induced by repeated intra-esophageal instillation of HCl in guinea pigs.

Authors:  Chunli Liu; Ruchong Chen; Wei Luo; Kefang Lai; Nanshan Zhong
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.