Literature DB >> 11096563

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

.   

Abstract

Prior to the advent of proton pump inhibitors, internists recommended antireflux surgery primarily for patients whose gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) failed to respond to medical therapy. Although many physicians still cling to the notion that antireflux surgery is a procedure best reserved for "medical failures," today this position is inappropriate. Modern medical treatments for GERD are extraordinarily effective in healing reflux esophagitis. It is uncommon to encounter patients with heartburn or esophagitis due to GERD who do not respond to aggressive antisecretory therapy. Indeed, the very diagnosis of GERD must be questioned for patients whose esophageal signs and symptoms are unaffected by the administration of proton pump inhibitors in high dosages. In the large majority of these so-called refractory patients, protracted esophageal pH monitoring reveals good control of acid reflux by the proton pump inhibitors. This finding indicates that the persistent symptoms usually are not due to acid reflux, but to other problems such as functional bowel disorders. Medical treatment fails in such patients because the diagnosis is mistaken, not because the drugs fail to control acid reflux. Modern antireflux surgery also is highly effective for controlling acid reflux, but fundoplication will not be effective for relieving symptoms in patients whose symptoms are not reflux-induced. Therefore, many patients deemed failures of modern medical therapy would be surgical failures as well. Antireflux surgery is an excellent treatment option for patients with documented GERD who respond well to medical therapy, but who wish to avoid the expense, inconvenience, and theoretical risks associated with lifelong medical treatment. Ironically, surgical therapy for GERD today is best reserved for patients who are medical successes.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 11096563     DOI: 10.1007/s11938-998-0007-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1092-8472


  31 in total

Review 1.  Extraesophageal presentations of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  J E Richter
Journal:  Semin Gastrointest Dis       Date:  1997-04

2.  Clinical and physiologic comparison of laparoscopic and open Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  J H Peters; J Heimbucher; W K Kauer; R Incarbone; C G Bremner; T R DeMeester
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  R A Hinder; C J Filipi; G Wetscher; P Neary; T R DeMeester; G Perdikis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Omeprazole v ranitidine for prevention of relapse in reflux oesophagitis. A controlled double blind trial of their efficacy and safety.

Authors:  J Dent; N D Yeomans; M Mackinnon; W Reed; F M Narielvala; D J Hetzel; E Solcia; D J Shearman
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Fate of Nissen fundoplication after 20 years. A clinical, endoscopical, and functional analysis.

Authors:  M Luostarinen; J Isolauri; J Laitinen; M Koskinen; O Keyriläinen; H Markkula; E Lehtinen; A Uusitalo
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Comparison of medical and surgical therapy for complicated gastroesophageal reflux disease in veterans. The Department of Veterans Affairs Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Study Group.

Authors:  S J Spechler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Evaluation of primary repair in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  T R DeMeester; L Bonavina; M Albertucci
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Patient satisfaction following laparoscopic and open antireflux surgery.

Authors:  D W Rattner; D C Brooks
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-03

9.  A comparison of five maintenance therapies for reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  S Vigneri; R Termini; G Leandro; S Badalamenti; M Pantalena; V Savarino; F Di Mario; G Battaglia; G S Mela; A Pilotto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-10-26       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  K R DeVault; D O Castell
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-11-13
View more
  1 in total

1.  Functional Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.