Literature DB >> 8610245

Noninvasive analysis of human neck muscle function.

M S Conley1, R A Meyer, J J Bloomberg, D L Feeback, G A Dudley.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Muscle use evoked by exercise was determined by quantifying shifts in signal relaxation times of T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. Images were collected at rest and after exercise at each of two intensities (moderate and intense) for each of four head movements: 1) extension, 2) flexion, 3) rotation, and 4) lateral flexion.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the intensity and pattern of neck muscle use evoked by various movements of the head. The results will help elucidate the pathophysiology, and thus methods for treating disorders of the cervical musculoskeletal system. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Exercise-induced contrast shifts in T2 has been shown to indicate muscle use during the activity. The noninvasive nature of magnetic resonance imaging appears to make it an ideal approach for studying the function of the complex neuromuscular system of the neck.
METHODS: The extent of T2 increase was examined to gauge how intensely nine different neck muscles or muscle pairs were used in seven subjects. The absolute and relative cross-sectional area of muscle showing a shift in signal relaxation was assessed to infer the pattern of use among and within individual neck muscles or muscle pairs.
RESULTS: Signal relaxation increased with exercise intensity for each head movement. The absolute and relative cross-sectional area of muscle showing a shift in signal relaxation also increased with exercise load. Neck muscles or muscle pairs extensively used to perform each head movement were: extension--semispinalis capitis and cervicis and splenius capitis; flexion--sternocleidomastoid and longus capitis and colli; rotation--splenius capitis, levator scapulae, scalenus, semispinalis capitis ipsilateral to the rotation, and sternocleidomastoid contralateral; and lateral flexion--sternocleidomastoid
CONCLUSION: The results of this study, in part, agree with the purported functions of neck muscles derived from anatomic location. This also was true for the few selected muscles that have been examined in human electromyographic studies. Neck muscle function and morphology can be studied at a detailed level using exercise-induced shifts in magnetic resonance images.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASA Center JSC; NASA Discipline Musculoskeletal; NASA Discipline Number 26-10; NASA Program Space Physiology and Countermeasures

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8610245     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199512000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  27 in total

1.  A novel posterior approach preserving three muscles inserted at C2 in multilevel cervical posterior decompression and fusion using C2 pedicle screws.

Authors:  Kazunari Takeuchi; Toru Yokoyama; Takuya Numasawa; Taito Itabashi; Yoshihito Yamasaki; Hitoshi Kudo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Anatomic variations of levator scapulae in a normal cohort: an MRI study.

Authors:  John Au; Alexandra L Webb; Graham Buirski; Paul N Smith; Mark R Pickering; Diana M Perriman
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Motor cortex representation of deep and superficial neck flexor muscles in individuals with and without neck pain.

Authors:  Edith Elgueta-Cancino; Welber Marinovic; Gwendolen Jull; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Tissue motion pattern of ventral neck muscles investigated by tissue velocity ultrasonography imaging.

Authors:  Michael Peolsson; Lars-Ake Brodin; Anneli Peolsson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Comparative histochemical composition of muscle fibres in a pre- and a postvertebral muscle of the cervical spine.

Authors:  L C Boyd-Clark; C A Briggs; M P Galea
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Effect of gaze direction on neck muscle activity during cervical rotation.

Authors:  Catharina S M Bexander; Rebecca Mellor; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Differentiation between deep and superficial fibers of the lumbar multifidus by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Nele Dickx; Barbara Cagnie; Erik Achten; Pieter Vandemaele; Thierry Parlevliet; Lieven Danneels
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Does a SLAP lesion affect shoulder muscle recruitment as measured by EMG activity during a rugby tackle?

Authors:  Ian G Horsley; Lee C Herrington; Christer Rolf
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Limitation of activities of daily living accompanying reduced neck mobility after laminoplasty preserving or reattaching the semispinalis cervicis into axis.

Authors:  Kazunari Takeuchi; Toru Yokoyama; Atsushi Ono; Takuya Numasawa; Kanichiro Wada; Taito Itabashi; Satoshi Toh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Feedforward activity of the cervical flexor muscles during voluntary arm movements is delayed in chronic neck pain.

Authors:  D Falla; G Jull; P W Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.