Literature DB >> 8609297

Influences of phonetic identification and category goodness on American listeners' perception of /r/ and /l/.

P Iverson1, P K Kuhl.   

Abstract

Recent experiments have demonstrated that category goodness influences the perception of vowels [Iverson and Kuhl, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 553-562 (1995)]; listeners show a perceptual magnet effect characterized by shrunken perceptual distances near excellent exemplars of vowel categories and stretched distances near poor exemplars. The present study extends this investigation by examining the relative influence of phonetic identification and category goodness on the perception of American English /r/ and /l/. Eighteen /ra/ and /la/ tokens were synthesized by varying F2 and F3 frequencies. Adult listeners identified and rated the goodness of individual stimuli, and rated the similarity of stimulus pairs. Multidimensional scaling analyses revealed that the perceptual space was shrunk near the best exemplars of each category and stretched near the category boundary. In addition, individual differences in /r/ identification corresponded to the degree of shrinking near the best exemplars of the /r/ category. The results demonstrate that category goodness and phonetic identification both contribute to the perception of /r/ and /l/.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8609297     DOI: 10.1121/1.415234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system.

Authors:  C T Best; G W McRoberts; E Goodell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Task-dependent activations of human auditory cortex to prototypical and nonprototypical vowels.

Authors:  Kirsi Harinen; Olli Aaltonen; Emma Salo; Oili Salonen; Teemu Rinne
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Individual variability in cue-weighting and lexical tone learning.

Authors:  Bharath Chandrasekaran; Padma D Sampath; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Categorizing speech.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Samuel Evans
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  A temporally dynamic context effect that disrupts voice onset time discrimination of rapidly successive stimuli.

Authors:  Jacqueline Liederman; Richard Frye; Janet McGraw Fisher; Kimberly Greenwood; Rebecca Alexander
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

6.  The developmental trajectory of children's perception and production of English /r/-/l/.

Authors:  Kaori Idemaru; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  A unified account of categorical effects in phonetic perception.

Authors:  Yakov Kronrod; Emily Coppess; Naomi H Feldman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

8.  Sleep duration predicts behavioral and neural differences in adult speech sound learning.

Authors:  F Sayako Earle; Nicole Landi; Emily B Myers
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Perceptual and neuronal boundary learned from higher-order stimulus probabilities.

Authors:  Hania Köver; Kirt Gill; Yi-Ting L Tseng; Shaowen Bao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The influence of categories on perception: explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference.

Authors:  Naomi H Feldman; Thomas L Griffiths; James L Morgan
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.