Literature DB >> 8609130

Infection after total hip arthroplasty. A study of the treatment of one hundred and six infections.

D T Tsukayama1, R Estrada, R B Gustilo.   

Abstract

We evaluated the results of treatment for ninety-seven patients (106 infections in ninety-eight hips) who had had either an infection after a total hip arthroplasty or positive intraoperative cultures of specimens obtained during revision of a total hip arthroplasty for presumed aseptic loosening. The patients were managed according to various protocols on the basis of the clinical setting (positive intraoperative cultures, early postoperative infection, late chronic infection, or acute hematogenous infection). Aerobic gram-positive cocci accounted for 109 (74 per cent) of the 147 microbial isolates; gram-negative bacilli, for twenty-one (14 per cent); and anaerobes, for twelve (8 per cent). The white blood-cell count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were elevated in association with seventeen (16 per cent) and sixty-seven (63 per cent) of the 106 infections, respectively. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.8 years (range, 0.3 to eleven years). A good result was noted after the initial treatment of twenty-eight (90 per cent) of the thirty-one infections that had been diagnosed on the basis of positive intraoperative cultures at the time of the revision, twenty-five (71 per cent) of the thirty-five early postoperative infections, twenty-nine (85 per cent) of the thirty-four late chronic infections, and three of the six acute hematogenous infections. Of the twenty++-one infections for which the initial therapy failed, twelve eventually were eradicated after additional treatment and the hip had a functional prosthesis at the time of follow-up. Of the ninety-seven infections that were treated successfully (there was a functional retained or exchange prosthesis in place at the time of the most recent follow-up and infection had not recurred at least two years after the discontinuation of antibiotic therapy), nine were associated with subsequent aseptic loosening of the prosthesis. The factors associated with recurrent infection were retained bone cement, the number of previous operations, potential immunocompromise, and early postoperative infection after arthroplasty without cement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8609130     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199604000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  201 in total

1.  Treatment Options for Orthopedic Device-related Infections.

Authors:  Edna Toubes; John Segreti
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  [Diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic infections].

Authors:  M Lenz; G O Hofmann; T Mückley
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  Infection in total hip replacement: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Surendra Senthi; Jacob T Munro; Rocco P Pitto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Comparison of infection control rates and clinical outcomes in culture-positive and culture-negative infected total-knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Sourabh S Kulkarni; Jang-Won Park; Jun-Shik Kim; Hyun-Keun Oh; Devarshi Rastogi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-02-17

5.  The results of two-stage revision TKA using Ceftazidime-Vancomycin-impregnated cement articulating spacers in Tsukayama Type II periprosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Michael Drexler; Tim Dwyer; Paul R T Kuzyk; Yona Kosashvilli; Mansour Abolghasemian; Gilad J Regev; Assaf Kadar; Tal Frenkel Rutenberg; David Backstein
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  [Diagnostic strategies in cases of suspected periprosthetic infection of the knee. A review of the literature and current recommendations].

Authors:  H Gollwitzer; P Diehl; L Gerdesmeyer; W Mittelmeier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Is arthroplasty immediately after an infected case a risk factor for infection?

Authors:  Mansour Abolghasemian; Amir Sternheim; Alireza Shakib; Oleg A Safir; David Backstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Clinical spectrum and outcome of critically ill patients suffering from prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Y Maaloum; A Meybeck; D Olive; N Boussekey; P-Y Delannoy; A Chiche; H Georges; E Beltrand; E Senneville; T d'Escrivan; O Leroy
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 9.  Candida infections of medical devices.

Authors:  Erna M Kojic; Rabih O Darouiche
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  A superficial swab culture is useful for microbiologic diagnosis in acute prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Jordi Cuñé; Alex Soriano; Juan C Martínez; Sebastián García; Josep Mensa
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.