Literature DB >> 8607392

Prospective comparison of flecainide versus quinidine for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation/flutter. The Flecainide Multicenter Atrial Fibrillation Study Group.

G V Naccarelli1, P Dorian, S H Hohnloser, P Coumel.   

Abstract

In order to compare the efficacy and long-term tolerability of flecainide acetate versus quinidine, 239 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were prospectively treated with flecainide (n = 122) or quinidine (n = 117) in an open-label, randomized trial. All patients were followed for 1 year after initiation of therapy unless their antiarrhythmic drug was discontinued due to an inadequate therapeutic response or intolerable side effects. Although both drugs were equally effective in adequately controlling recurrences of atrial fibrillation (difference, p = 0.282; not significant), fewer flecainide patients had to have their therapy discontinued due to adverse experiences (p = 0.012). Based on both endpoints (efficacy and tolerability), an estimated 70.5% of flecainide versus 55.4% of quinidine patients would remain effectively treated at the end of 1 year on therapy (p < or = 0.007). The findings of this prospective study suggest that in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (1) flecainide and quinidine are equally effective in the acceptable suppression of symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; (2) flecainide is better tolerated than quinidine and is less likely to be discontinued due to adverse effects; and (3) given the overall endpoint of efficacy and tolerability, more patients are likely to continue long-term therapy with flecainide than with quinidine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8607392     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(97)89118-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  20 in total

Review 1.  [Cardiology update. I: Electrophysiology].

Authors:  P Weismüller; H J Trappe
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-01-15

Review 2.  A review of clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of newer antiarrhythmic drugs in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Gerald V Naccarelli; Deborah L Wolbrette; Luna Bhatta; Mazhar Khan; John Hynes; Soraya Samii; Jerry Luck
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Recent developments in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  M Bilal Iqbal; Anil K Taneja; Gregory Y H Lip; Marcus Flather
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-01-29

Review 4.  [Pharmacotherapy of supraventricular arrhythmias. What comes, what remains, what goes?].

Authors:  T Lewalter; G Nickenig
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 5.  Antiarrhythmic therapy in atrial fibrillation: indications, guidelines, and safety.

Authors:  Armin Barekatain; Mehdi Razavi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

Review 6.  Safety of flecainide.

Authors:  Juan Tamargo; Alessandro Capucci; Philippe Mabo
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Role of Bi-Atrial Pacing In Slowing The Progression of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation To Permanent Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Raffaele Corbisiero; Kathleen Zazzali; David Muller
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-12-31

Review 8.  Prophylactic Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Moisés Rodríguez-Mañero; Andrea Sarkozy; Gian-Battista Chierchia; Rubén Casado-Arroyo; Danilo Ricciardi; Carlo de Asmundis; Andrea Carlo de; Pedro Sarkozy
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-02-12

Review 9.  Maintaining stability of sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation: antiarrhythmic drugs versus ablation.

Authors:  Gerald V Naccarelli; John Hynes; Deborah L Wolbrette; Luna Bhatta; Mazhar Khan; Jerry Luck
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Cost effectiveness of therapies for atrial fibrillation. A review.

Authors:  M P Teng; L E Catherwood; D P Melby
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.