Literature DB >> 8607149

Characterization of reactions after transfusion of cellular blood components that are white cell reduced before storage.

I Federowicz1, B B Barrett, J W Andersen, M Urashima, M A Popovsky, K C Anderson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the storage of cellular components before transfusion, cytokines that may mediate transfusion reactions are released from white cells (WBCs). Adverse effects of transfused cellular blood components therefore depend not only on the number of residual WBCs in blood components, but also on the timing of WBC reduction. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTRs), allergic reactions, and other reactions were characterized in recipients of 4728 units of red cells (RBCs) and 3405 bags of single-donor apheresis platelets (SDAPs), all of which underwent prestorage WBC reduction. To delineate the impact of prestorage versus poststorage WBC reduction of RBCs on transfusion reactions, these results were compared with reactions occurring after the transfusion to similar recipients of 6447 bags of RBCs that underwent poststorage WBC reduction by bedside filtration and 5197 units of SDAPs that underwent prestorage WBC reduction. The levels of interleukin (IL) 1 beta, IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) were measured in a subset of 20 implicated cellular blood components at the time of transfusion reactions and correlated with the duration of storage before transfusion.
RESULTS: The incidence of reactions was greater after transfusions of SDAPs (5.49%) than of RBCs (1.63%). The incidence of FNHTRs after transfusion of RBCs that were WBC reduced before storage (1.1%) was significantly lower (p = 0.0045) than that after transfusion of RBCs that were WBC reduced after storage (2.15%). Although allergic reactions to RBCs that were WBC reduced before storage were also less common (0.41%) than those to RBCs that were WBC reduced after storage (0.51%), the difference was not significant (p = 0.067). At the time of reactions to RBCs and SDAPs that were reduced before storage, the level of IL-6 was negatively correlated (r = -0.54, p = 0.014) with the duration of storage before transfusion, and there was no correlation between the level of either IL-1 beta or IL-8 and the interval before transfusion. TNF-alpha was not detectable in any implicated component.
CONCLUSION: FNHTRs, but not allergic reactions, were less common after transfusion of RBCs that were WBC reduced before storage than after the transfusion of those WBC reduced after storage at the bedside by filtration. The level of IL-6 in implicated cellular blood components that were WBC reduced before storage was inversely correlated with the length of storage before transfusion. Further studies are needed to determine whether the transfusion of cellular blood components that were WBC reduced before storage can both diminish the incidence of adverse reactions and improve outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8607149     DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1996.36196190511.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  6 in total

Review 1.  Acetaminophen and diphenhydramine premedication for allergic and febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions: good prophylaxis or bad practice?

Authors:  Terrence L Geiger; Scott C Howard
Journal:  Transfus Med Rev       Date:  2007-01

2.  Effects of Prestorage Leukoreduction on the Rate of Febrile Nonhemolytic Transfusion Reactions to Red Blood Cells in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  K Rajesh; S Harsh; K Amarjit
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2015 May-Jun

3.  Retrospective evaluation of adverse transfusion reactions following blood product transfusion from a tertiary care hospital: A preliminary step towards hemovigilance.

Authors:  Praveen Kumar; Rakesh Thapliyal; Poonam Coshic; Kabita Chatterjee
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2013-07

4.  Clinical response and transfusion reactions of sheep subjected to single homologous blood transfusion.

Authors:  Rejane Santos Sousa; Antonio Humberto Hamad Minervino; Carolina Akiko Sato Cabral Araújo; Frederico Augusto Mazzocca Lopes Rodrigues; Francisco Leonardo Costa Oliveira; Clara Satsuki Mori; Janaina Larissa Rodrigues Zaminhan; Thiago Rocha Moreira; Isadora Karolina Freitas Sousa; Enrico Lippi Ortolani; Raimundo Alves Barrêto
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-12-03

5.  Haemovigilance of reactions associated with red blood cell transfusion: comparison across 17 Countries.

Authors:  M A M Rogers; J M Rohde; N Blumberg
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.144

6.  Does training make a difference? Proficiency training in transfusion guidelines and its effect on red blood cell administration.

Authors:  Svetlana Daichman; Daniel Ostrovsky; Jacob Dreiher; Oleg Pikovsky
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.337

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.