Literature DB >> 8604959

Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by a decision analysis-based strategy including clinical probability, D-dimer levels, and ultrasonography: a management study.

A Perrier1, H Bounameaux, A Morabia, P de Moerloose, D Slosman, D Didier, A Junod.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the clinical probability of pulmonary emboli sm, plasma D-dimer measurement, and lower-limb venous compression ultrasonography have all been advocated in the workup of suspected pulmonary embolism, to minimize the requirement for pulmonary angiography in patients with nondiagnostic lung scans. However, their contribution has not been assessed prospectively.
METHODS: Three hundred eight consecutive patients who came to the emergency department with suspected pulmonary embolism were managed according to a diagnostic protocol that included clinical probability assessment, lung scan, and sequential noninvasive tests: plasma D-dimer measurement by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (a concentration <500 microgram/L ruled out pulmonary embolism) and lower-limb B-mode venous compression ultrasonography (a positive finding was diagnostic of venous thromboembolism). Patients without pulmonary embolism according to the diagnostic workup did not receive anticoagulant treatment. The safety of this approach was assessed by a 6-month follow-up.
RESULTS: of the 308 patients, 106 (34%) had a diagnostic lung scan (normal in 43 and high probability in 63). For the remaining 202 patients, noninvasive workup was diagnostic in 125 (62%). Pulmonary embolism was ruled out by a low clinical probability and a nondiagnostic scan in 48 patients and a D-dimer level less than 500 microgram/L in 53; pulmonary embolism was established by a high clinical probability and a nondiagnostic scan in seven patients and by a finding of a deep vein thrombosis on ultrasonography in 17. Therefore, only 77 of these 202 patients underwent pulmonary angiography (negative in 55; positive in 22). At 6-month follow-up (completed for 99.4% of the study population), only two of the 199 patients in whom the diagnostic protocol had ruled out pulmonary embolism (1.0% [95% confidence interval, 0.1 to 3.6]) had a thromboembolic event (pulmonary embolism, one; deep vein thrombosis, one).
CONCLUSIONS: This decision analysis strategy yielded a definitive noninvasive diagnosis in 62% of patients with a nondiagnostic scan and appears to be safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8604959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  24 in total

Review 1.  Role of fibrin D-dimer testing in emergency medicine.

Authors:  A Wakai; A Gleeson; D Winter
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Acute pulmonary embolism. Part 1: epidemiology and diagnosis.

Authors:  Renée A Douma; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Harry R Büller
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  D-dimer testing: advantages and limitations in emergency medicine for managing acute venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Sergio Siragusa
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Pierre-Marie Roy; Isabelle Colombet; Pierre Durieux; Gilles Chatellier; Hervé Sors; Guy Meyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-30

5.  Subsegmental pulmonary embolism: is the emperor still naked?

Authors:  Maurizio Zompatori; Domenico Attinà; Fabio Niro; Gualtiero Palareti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: a practical approach. British Thoracic Society, Standards of Care Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Role of echocardiography in the evaluation of syncope: a prospective study.

Authors:  F P Sarasin; A-F Junod; D Carballo; S Slama; P-F Unger; M Louis-Simonet
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: diagnosis of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Wendy Lim; Grégoire Le Gal; Shannon M Bates; Marc Righini; Linda B Haramati; Eddy Lang; Jeffrey A Kline; Sonja Chasteen; Marcia Snyder; Payal Patel; Meha Bhatt; Parth Patel; Cody Braun; Housne Begum; Wojtek Wiercioch; Holger J Schünemann; Reem A Mustafa
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

Review 9.  Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Clive Kearon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  Diagnosing pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  M Riedel
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.