Literature DB >> 8602658

Pharmacodynamic interaction between propofol and alfentanil when given for induction of anesthesia.

J Vuyk1, F H Engbers, A G Burm, A A Vletter, G E Griever, E Olofsen, J G Bovill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Propofol and alfentanil often are combined during induction of anesthesia. However, the interaction between these agents during induction has not been studied in detail. The influence of alfentanil on the propofol concentration-effect relationships was studied for loss of eyelash reflex, loss of consciousness, and hemodynamic function in 20 unpremedicated ASA physical status 1 patients aged 20-55 yr.
METHODS: Patients were randomly divided into four groups to receive a computer- controlled infusion of alfentanil with target concentrations of 0, 50, 200, or 400 ng/ml (groups A, B, C, and D, respectively). While the target concentration of alfentanil was maintained constant, patients received a computer- controlled infusion of propofol, with an initial target concentration of 0.5-1 microgram/ml, that was increased every 12 min by 0.5-1 microgram/ml. Every 3 min, the eyelash reflex and state of consciousness were tested an an arterial blood sample was taken for blood propofol and plasma alfentanil determination. The propofol-alfentanil concentration-response relationships for loss of eyelash reflex and loss of consciousness were determined by nonlinear regression, and for the percentage of change in systolic blood pressure and heart rate by logistic regression.
RESULTS: The patient characteristics did not differ significantly among the four groups. The patients in groups A and B continued to breathe adequately, whereas all patients in groups C and D required assisted ventilation. End-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure remained less than 46 mmHg in all patients. With plasma alfentanil concentrations increasing from 0 to 500 ng/ml, the EC(50) of propofol decreased from 2.07 to 0.83 microgram/ml for loss of eyelash reflex and from 3.62 to 1.55 microgram/ml for loss of consciousness. With plasma alfentanil concentrations increasing from 0 to 500 ng/ml, the blood propofol concentrations associated with a 10% decrease in systolic blood pressure and heart rate decreased from 1.68 to 0.17 microgram/ml and from 2.36 to 0.04 microgram/ml, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Alfentanil significantly reduces blood propofol concentrations required for loss of eyelash reflex and loss of consciousness. In addition, alfentanil enhances the depressant effects of propofol on systolic blood pressure and heart rate. Hemodynamic stability, therefore, does not increase in patients receiving propofol in combination with alfentanil compared to those receiving propofol as the sole agent for induction of anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8602658     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199602000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  12 in total

1.  Age and sex-related differences in dose-dependent hemodynamic response to landiolol hydrochloride during general anesthesia.

Authors:  Ju Mizuno; Ikuto Yoshiya; Takeshi Yokoyama; Yoshitsugu Yamada; Hideko Arita; Kazuo Hanaoka
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Comparison between monitored anesthesia care with remifentanil under ilioinguinal hypogastric nerve block and spinal anesthesia for herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  Yun-Sic Bang; Chunghyun Park; Su-Yeon Lee; Minku Kim; Juho Lee; Taegyu Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-05-24

Review 3.  Induction of anaesthesia: a guide to drug choice.

Authors:  Nathalie Nathan; Isabelle Odin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  A comparison of the hemodynamic changes and propofolinduced pain at two different doses of remifentanil in elderly patients.

Authors:  Sang Hi Park; Soon Taek Jeong; Yang Ju Tak; Chong Soo Kim; Sang Tae Kim
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-06-23

5.  Propofol-fentanyl versus propofol alone for lumbar puncture sedation in children with acute hematologic malignancies: propofol dosing and adverse events.

Authors:  Gregory A Hollman; Meredith M Schultz; Jens C Eickhoff; Devon K Christenson
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.624

Review 6.  Strategies to optimise propofol-opioid anaesthesia.

Authors:  Bart-Jan Lichtenbelt; Martijn Mertens; Jaap Vuyk
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

7.  The determinants of propofol induction time in anesthesia.

Authors:  Yushi U Adachi; Maiko Satomoto; Hideyuki Higuchi; Kazuhiko Watanabe
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-08-27

8.  Effect-site concentration of remifentanil for blunting hemodynamic responses to tracheal intubation using light wand during target controlled infusion-total intravenous anesthesia.

Authors:  Jun Heum Yon; Jae Keun Jo; Young-Suk Kwon; Hae-Gyun Park; Sangseok Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-06-17

9.  The safety and efficacy of alfentanil-based induction in bronchoscopy sedation: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

Authors:  Chung-Hsing Hsieh; Ting-Yu Lin; Tsai-Yu Wang; Chih-Hsi Kuo; Shu-Min Lin; Han-Pin Kuo; Yu-Lun Lo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Optimal effect-site concentration of remifentanil for minimizing cardiovascular changes caused by fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Kim; Hyun-Wook Jeon; Tae-Kyun Kim; Seung-Hoon Baek; Ji-Uk Yoon; Ji-Young Yoon
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.