Literature DB >> 17385942

Induction of anaesthesia: a guide to drug choice.

Nathalie Nathan1, Isabelle Odin.   

Abstract

In developed countries, the choice of an anaesthetic agent for induction of anaesthesia remains based mainly on its pharmacodynamic properties. Until now, cardiovascular effects were the main factor in this decision. However, other factors, such as the depth of anaesthesia and effects on cortisol synthesis, can modify this simplistic view. A better understanding of the relationships between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these drugs, and the availability of new techniques, such as target-controlled infusions of anaesthetic drugs and inhalation induction, have led practitioners to the understanding that the way a drug is administered is a far more important factor for maintaining haemodynamic stability than the specific agent used. The ability of a drug to maintain spontaneous ventilation and to relax the upper airway is another factor in this decision, especially when considering difficult intubation, laryngeal mask insertion or tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blockade. Beyond the factors mentioned above, anaesthetists adapt current practice to suit patients' willingness to comply with anaesthesia and to avoid the adverse effects that are most often feared by the patient. Although most practitioners are not concerned with the cost of anaesthesia, cost-containment policies have led some institutions to restrict the use of the more expensive drugs to particular indications. However, this is too simplistic an approach for the reduction of global costs, as other direct medical costs, such as those for staffing, form a greater proportion of total costs than do direct drug costs. Cost-benefit and cost-efficacy studies of the anaesthetics used for induction of anaesthesia are needed to help anaesthetists to choose a drug based on both cost and pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17385942     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200767050-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  216 in total

1.  Manual versus target-controlled infusions of propofol.

Authors:  D S Breslin; R K Mirakhur; J E Reid; A Kyle
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.955

2.  Cost analysis of target-controlled infusion-based anesthesia compared with standard anesthesia regimens.

Authors:  S Suttner; J Boldt; C Schmidt; S Piper; B Kumle
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Alarming reactions to ketamine in patients taking thyroid medication--treatment with propranolol.

Authors:  J A Kaplan; L H Cooperman
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  A multicentre comparison of the costs of anaesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol.

Authors:  I Smith; P A Terhoeve; D Hennart; P Feiss; M Harmer; J L Pourriat; I A Johnson
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Direct cardiac effects in isolated perfused rat hearts measured at increasing concentrations of morphine, alfentanil, fentanyl, ketamine, etomidate, thiopentone, midazolam and propofol.

Authors:  O Süzer; A Süzer; Z Aykaç; Z Ozüner
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Dynamic and static cerebral autoregulation during isoflurane, desflurane, and propofol anesthesia.

Authors:  S Strebel; A M Lam; B Matta; T S Mayberg; R Aaslid; D W Newell
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  A prospective study of risk factors and cardiopulmonary complications associated with anaesthesia and surgery: risk indicators of cardiopulmonary morbidity.

Authors:  T Pedersen; K Eliasen; E Henriksen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.105

8.  Propofol - not thiopental or etomidate - with remifentanil provides adequate intubating conditions in the absence of neuromuscular blockade.

Authors:  Elvan Erhan; Gulden Ugur; Ilkben Gunusen; Isik Alper; Bulent Ozyar
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Haemodynamic response to induction of anaesthesia with ketamine/midazolam.

Authors:  R Marlow; D L Reich; S Neustein; G Silvay
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.063

10.  Bispectral index in patients with target-controlled or manually-controlled infusion of propofol.

Authors:  Andreas Lehmann; Joachim Boldt; Elfi Thaler; Swen Piper; Udo Weisse
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Drugs for intravenous induction of anesthesia: propofol].

Authors:  D Bolkenius; C Dumps; E Halbeck
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Anesthesia for stem cell transplantation in autistic children: A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of propofol and etomidate following sevoflurane inhalation.

Authors:  Yu-Heng Ma; Yong-Wang Li; Li Ma; Cai-Hong Cao; Xiang-Dong Liu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Pharmaco-economics: Minute-based cost of sevoflurane in pediatric short procedures and its relation to demographic variables.

Authors:  Preet Mohinder Singh; Anjan Trikha; Renu Sinha; Rashmi Ramachandran; Vimi Rewari; Anuradha Borle
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07

4.  Efficacy of Combination of Esmolol and Diltiazem for Attenuating Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  Vandana Talwar; Veena Ganeriwal; Shipra Aggarwal; Akhilesh Gupta
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.