Literature DB >> 8602297

Anticardiolipin antibodies: clinical consequences of "low titers".

R M Silver1, T F Porter, I van Leeuween, G Jeng, J R Scott, D W Branch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the implications of low levels of immunoglobulin (Ig)-G or IgM anticardiolipin antibodies.
METHODS: Women who underwent clinically indicated testing for antiphospholipid antibodies were divided into four groups based on results: 1) high-positive (lupus anticoagulant or more than 19 IgG binding units of anticardiolipin antibodies; N = 131), 2) low-positive IgG (fewer than 20 IgG binding units; N 93), 3) IgM only (more than nine IgM binding units; N 97), and 4) negative (N = 153). The development of antiphospholipid antibody-related disorders was assessed for the time interval from initial antibody testing to patient interview. The median study interval for each group was at least 4 years. Forty-five percent of women had repeat testing at the time of interview.
RESULTS: Women in the high-positive group were more likely to develop at least one new medical complication than those in the low-positive IgG (odds ratio [OR] 4.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.01-10.03), IgM only (OR 6.00, 95% CI 2.65-13.59), and negative (OR 9.11, 95% CI 3.92-21.2) groups. In contrast, the low-positive IgG, IgM only, and negative groups had similar risks for the development of new disorders. Twelve of 129 (9.3%) women in the low-positive IgG, IgM only, or negative groups had lupus anticoagulant or more than 19 IgG binding units on retesting. Half of these women developed at least one new disorder.
CONCLUSION: Women with IgM or low levels of IgG anticardiolipin antibodies comprise distinct populations from those with lupus anticoagulant or moderate to high levels of anticardiolipin antibodies. These women are not at risk for antiphospholipid antibody-related disorders beyond the risk conferred by their medical histories. However, repeat testing is warranted with new or recurrent clinical symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8602297     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00497-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

Review 1.  Testing for and clinical significance of anticardiolipin antibodies.

Authors:  S W Reddel; S A Krilis
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  1999-11

2.  Antiphospholipid antibodies and pregnancy outcomes in women heterozygous for factor V Leiden.

Authors:  Tracy Manuck; D Ware Branch; Yinglei Lai; Baha Sibai; Catherine Y Spong; George Wendel; Katharine Wenstrom; Philip Samuels; Steve N Caritis; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Mary J O'Sullivan; Deborah Conway; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 4.054

Review 3.  [Systematic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome during pregnancy].

Authors:  G Ruiz-Irastorza; M A Khamashta
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Prevalence of anticardiolipin antibodies in pregnancies with history of repeated miscarriages.

Authors:  Ligia Cosentino Junqueira Franco Spegiorin; Eloísa A Galão; Lúcia Buchalla Bagarelli; Antonio Hélio Oliani; José Maria Pereira de Godoy
Journal:  Open Rheumatol J       Date:  2010-08-26

5.  Complete resolution of a mitral valve vegetation with anticoagulation in seronegative antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Yuheng Ruan; Jonathan S Bridges; Kapil Kumar; Jonelle A Raphael; Subroto Acharjee; Francine K Welty
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  The incidence of various antiphospholipid antibodies, measured by commercial-based laboratory, with recurrent spontenous abortion and the impact of their profiles on reproductive outcome with active anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  Nagayoshi Umehara; Tadao Tanaka
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.