Literature DB >> 8601980

Mediastinal lymph node staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective comparison of computed tomography and positron emission tomography.

W J Scott1, L S Gobar, J D Terry, N A Dewan, J J Sunderland.   

Abstract

We compared the abilities of positron emission tomography and computed tomography to detect N2 or N3 lymph node metastases (N2 or N3) in patients with lung cancer. Positron emission tomography detects increased rates of glucose uptake, characteristic of malignant cells. Patients with peripheral tumors smaller than 2 cm and a normal mediastinum were ineligible. All patients underwent computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and surgical staging. The American Thoracic Society lymph node map was used. Computed and positron emission tomographic scans were read by separate radiologists blinded to surgical staging results. Lymph nodes were "positive" by computed tomography if larger than 1.0 cm in short-axis diameter. Standardized uptake values were recorded from areas on positron emission tomography corresponding to those from which biopsy specimens were taken; if greater than 4.2, they were called "positive." Seventy-five lymph node stations (2.8 per patient) were analyzed in 27 patients. Computed tomography incorrectly staged the mediastinum as positive for metastases in three patients and as negative for metastases in three patients. Sensitivity and specificity of computed tomographic scans were 67% and 83%, respectively. Positron emission tomography correctly staged the mediastinum in all 27 patients. When analyzed by individual node station, there were four false positive and four false negative results by computed tomography (sensitivity = 60%, specificity = 93%, positive predictive value = 60%). Positron emission tomography mislabeled one node station as positive (100% sensitive, 98% specific, positive predictive value 91%). The differences were significant when the data were analyzed both for individual lymph node stations (p = 0.039) and for patients (p = 0.031) (McNemar test). Positron emission tomography and computed tomography are more accurate than computed tomography alone in detecting mediastinal lymph node metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8601980     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70317-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  20 in total

Review 1.  18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and the staging of early lung cancer.

Authors:  G Laking; P Price
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Positron emission tomography (PET) in the evaluation of patients with cancer.

Authors:  H A Godwin; J H Zuger
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  1999

3.  Requirements for clinical PET: comparisons within Europe.

Authors:  Michael Bedford; Michael N Maisey
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Oncologic positron emission tomography: a surgical perspective.

Authors:  Todd O Moore; Landis K Griffeth
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-01

5.  Additional value of PET-CT in the staging of lung cancer: comparison with CT alone, PET alone and visual correlation of PET and CT.

Authors:  W De Wever; S Ceyssens; L Mortelmans; S Stroobants; G Marchal; J Bogaert; J A Verschakelen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-09       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Size of noncancerous hilomediastinal lymph nodes measured on coronal and sagittal reconstruction CT images.

Authors:  Mizue Hasegawa; Fumikazu Sakai; Fumiko Kimura; Kaiji Inoue; Atsushi Nagai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-25       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  A proposal for combined MRI and PET/CT interpretation criteria for preoperative nodal staging in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Yoo Na Kim; Chin A Yi; Kyung Soo Lee; O Jung Kwon; Ho Yun Lee; Byung-Tae Kim; Joon Young Choi; Seon Woo Kim; Man Pyo Chung; Joungho Han; Tae Sung Kim; Myung Jin Chung; Young Mog Shim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Mediastinoscopy: trends and practice patterns in the United States.

Authors:  Krishna S Vyas; Daniel L Davenport; Victor A Ferraris; Sibu P Saha
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.954

Review 9.  Current role of positron emission tomography in thoracic oncology.

Authors:  V J Lowe; K S Naunheim
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  18F-FDG PET for the lymph node staging of non-small cell lung cancer in a tuberculosis-endemic country: is dual time point imaging worth the effort?

Authors:  Ruoh-Fang Yen; Ke-Cheng Chen; Jang-Ming Lee; Yeun-Chung Chang; Jane Wang; Mei-Fang Cheng; Yen-Wen Wu; Yung-Chie Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.