OBJECTIVES: Historically, mediastinoscopy has been the gold standard for the staging of lung cancer. A practice gap exists as the result of a variation in knowledge concerning current trends and practice patterns of mediastinoscopy usage. In addition, there are regional variations in practice-based learning and patient care. Lessons learned during surgeries performed on patients with lung cancer and other advances such as positron emission tomography and endobronchial ultrasound could be universally applied to improve surgeons' management of patient care. The purpose of this study was to assess contemporary practices in the staging of lung cancer. METHODS: We queried the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database for data regarding mediastinoscopy usage, yield, and variation, both by year and region. RESULTS: Cases with mediastinoscopy, as a percentage of all cases performed in the database, have significantly decreased from 14.6% in 2006 to 11.4% in 2010 (P < 0.001). The 5-year median rate of mediastinoscopy in lung cancer patients at 163 centers was 15.3% (interquartile range 5.2%-31.7%), indicating significant variation among centers. The overall median center rate also decreased over time from 21.4% (2006) to 10.0% (2010). CONCLUSIONS: With advances in minimally invasive procedures and imaging, mediastinoscopy usage has declined significantly. Our findings are likely to be relevant to both clinical practice and practice guidelines.
OBJECTIVES: Historically, mediastinoscopy has been the gold standard for the staging of lung cancer. A practice gap exists as the result of a variation in knowledge concerning current trends and practice patterns of mediastinoscopy usage. In addition, there are regional variations in practice-based learning and patient care. Lessons learned during surgeries performed on patients with lung cancer and other advances such as positron emission tomography and endobronchial ultrasound could be universally applied to improve surgeons' management of patient care. The purpose of this study was to assess contemporary practices in the staging of lung cancer. METHODS: We queried the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database for data regarding mediastinoscopy usage, yield, and variation, both by year and region. RESULTS: Cases with mediastinoscopy, as a percentage of all cases performed in the database, have significantly decreased from 14.6% in 2006 to 11.4% in 2010 (P < 0.001). The 5-year median rate of mediastinoscopy in lung cancerpatients at 163 centers was 15.3% (interquartile range 5.2%-31.7%), indicating significant variation among centers. The overall median center rate also decreased over time from 21.4% (2006) to 10.0% (2010). CONCLUSIONS: With advances in minimally invasive procedures and imaging, mediastinoscopy usage has declined significantly. Our findings are likely to be relevant to both clinical practice and practice guidelines.
Authors: Anthony Lemaire; Ivana Nikolic; Thomas Petersen; Jack C Haney; Eric M Toloza; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico; William R Burfeind Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Gonzalo V Gonzalez-Stawinski; Anthony Lemaire; Faisal Merchant; Elizabeth O'Halloran; R Edward Coleman; David H Harpole; Thomas A D'Amico Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Jung Min Chang; Hyun Ju Lee; Jin Mo Goo; Ho-Young Lee; Jong Jin Lee; June-Key Chung; Jung-Gi Im Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2006 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Tyler R Grenda; Tiffany N S Ballard; Andrea T Obi; William Pozehl; F Jacob Seagull; Ryan Chen; Amy M Cohn; Mark S Daskin; Rishindra M Reddy Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2016-12
Authors: Yu-Wen Chiu; Yu-Hsiang Kao; Michael J Simoff; David E Ost; Oliver Wagner; James Lavin; Richard A Culbertson; Dean G Smith Journal: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2021-03-17
Authors: Yichen Zhang; Michael J Simoff; David Ost; Oliver J Wagner; James Lavin; Beth Nauman; Mei-Chin Hsieh; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Brian Pettiford; Lizheng Shi Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2021-04-14 Impact factor: 4.430