Literature DB >> 8598996

Invited article: helical/spiral CT scanning: a pediatric radiology perspective.

K S White1.   

Abstract

Helical/spiral CT technology has several potential benefits for scanning pediatric patients. These benefits include reduced sedation rates, decreased radiation exposure with scanning at extended pitch, improved image quality, and better three-dimensional and reformatted images. This paper reviews the technical and clinical considerations relevant to scanning the pediatric patient and offers suggestions for protocol development.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1996        PMID： 8598996     DOI： 10.1007/bf01403695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN： 0301-0449


  25 in total

1.  Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT.

Authors:  A Polacin; W A Kalender; G Marchal
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Reconstructed helical CT scans: improvement in z-axis resolution compared with overlapped and nonoverlapped conventional CT scans.

Authors:  C J Kasales; K D Hopper; D N Ariola; T R TenHave; J W Meilstrup; R P Mahraj; D Van Hook; S Westacott; R J Sefczek; J D Barr
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times.

Authors:  B R Herts; D M Paushter; D M Einstein; R Zepp; R A Friedman; N Obuchowski
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Spiral CT of musculoskeletal pathology: preliminary observations.

Authors:  E K Fishman; S H Wyatt; D A Bluemke; B A Urban
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Three-dimensional helical CT angiography.

Authors:  G D Rubin
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Pulmonary nodule: evaluation with spiral volumetric CT.

Authors:  P Costello; W Anderson; D Blume
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Spiral CT of the temporal bone in unsedated pediatric patients.

Authors:  G D Luker; B C Lee; K K Erickson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Slip-ring and conventional dynamic hepatic CT: contrast material and timing considerations.

Authors:  L L Berland
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Detection of focal hepatic lesions with spiral CT: comparison of 4- and 8-mm interscan spacing.

Authors:  B A Urban; E K Fishman; J E Kuhlman; A Kawashima; J G Hennessey; S S Siegelman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Conspicuity of hepatic metastases on helical CT: effect of different time delays between contrast administration and scanning.

Authors:  P M Silverman; J O'Malley; M C Tefft; C Cooper; R K Zeman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.959
View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Advances in radiology.

Authors:  T R Goodman; K McHugh
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Pilot study for the establishment of biomarkers for radiation damage after computed tomography in children.

Authors:  Brunhild M Halm; Adrian A Franke; Jennifer F Lai; Xingnan Li; Laurie J Custer; Ian Pagano; Robert V Cooney; Helen C Turner; David J Brenner
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2015-03

3.  Pediatric CT scan usage in Japan: results of a hospital survey.

Authors:  Nader Ghotbi; Akira Ohtsuru; Yoji Ogawa; Mariko Morishita; Nana Norimatsu; Hiroyuki Namba; Hiroyuki Moriuchi; Masataka Uetani; Shunichi Yamashita
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2006-10

4.  Strengthening the argument for rapid brain MR imaging: estimation of reduction in lifetime attributable risk of developing fatal cancer in children with shunted hydrocephalus by instituting a rapid brain MR imaging protocol in lieu of Head CT.

Authors:  K Koral; T Blackburn; A A Bailey; K M Koral; J Anderson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  In vivo changes in plasma coenzyme Q10, carotenoid, tocopherol, and retinol levels in children after computer tomography.

Authors:  Brunhild M Halm; Jennifer F Lai; Cynthia M Morrison; Ian Pagano; Laurie J Custer; Robert V Cooney; Adrian A Franke
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.013

Review 6.  Paediatric computed tomography radiation dose: A review of the global dilemma.

Authors:  Hussain Almohiy
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-01-28

7.  Low-dose nonenhanced head CT protocol for follow-up evaluation of children with ventriculoperitoneal shunt: reduction of radiation and effect on image quality.

Authors:  U K Udayasankar; K Braithwaite; M Arvaniti; D Tudorascu; W C Small; S Little; S Palasis
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Three-dimensional skull models as a problem-solving tool in suspected child abuse.

Authors:  Sanjay P Prabhu; Alice W Newton; Jeannette M Perez-Rossello; Paul K Kleinman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-11-25

9.  Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians.

Authors:  John D Mathews; Anna V Forsythe; Zoe Brady; Martin W Butler; Stacy K Goergen; Graham B Byrnes; Graham G Giles; Anthony B Wallace; Philip R Anderson; Tenniel A Guiver; Paul McGale; Timothy M Cain; James G Dowty; Adrian C Bickerstaffe; Sarah C Darby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-21

10.  Radiation dose in paediatric computed tomography: risks and benefits.

Authors:  G I Ogbole
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2010-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.