Literature DB >> 7717248

Reconstructed helical CT scans: improvement in z-axis resolution compared with overlapped and nonoverlapped conventional CT scans.

C J Kasales1, K D Hopper, D N Ariola, T R TenHave, J W Meilstrup, R P Mahraj, D Van Hook, S Westacott, R J Sefczek, J D Barr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study was designed to assess the z-axis resolving capabilities of reconstructed helical CT scans obtained with various imaging parameters versus those of conventional CT scans and the effect of decreasing slice index on the z-axis resolution of helical CT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A z-axis line-pair phantom was imaged using conventional nonoverlapped CT scans, conventional CT scans that overlapped by 50%, and helical CT scans with pitches of 1.0 and 1.5. All helical images were reconstructed at comparable slice indexes (image indexes of 2.0, 1.0, and 0.5 mm for pitch = 1.0, and image indexes of 3.0, 1.5, and 0.75 mm for pitch = 1.5). Midline coronal and sagittal reconstructed images were obtained to allow standardized visualization of line pairs. The reconstructed images were reviewed separately by 10 radiologists.
RESULTS: The overall z-axis resolution of reconstructed helical CT scans equaled or exceeded that of nonoverlapped conventional CT scans in all cases and equaled that of 50% overlapped conventional CT scans in 75% of cases. The 1.0-pitch helical sequences showed improved z-axis resolution with decreasing slice index. No statistically significant improvement in z-axis resolution could be determined by the observers for 1.5-pitch sequences with decreasing slice index.
CONCLUSION: The use of helical CT with a pitch of 1.0 or 1.5 and an increased slice index can improve the z-axis resolution of reconstructed images when compared with nonoverlapped conventional CT and frequently equals the resolution of 50% overlapped conventional CT. This improvement in z-axis resolution should improve the appearance of reconstructed images (as used in CT angiography and three-dimensional imaging) by reducing partial volume artifacts while affording faster scanning at a reduced skin-surface radiation dose.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7717248     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.164.5.7717248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

1.  Multi-detector row CT scanning in Paleoanthropology at various tube current settings and scanning mode.

Authors:  J Badawi-Fayad; C Yazbeck; A Balzeau; T H Nguyen; A Istoc; D Grimaud-Hervé; E- A Cabanis
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Diagnostic potential of virtual bronchoscopy: advantages in comparison with axial CT slices, MPR and mIP?

Authors:  U Rapp-Bernhardt; T Welte; W Doehring; S Kropf; T M Bernhardt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Four-dimensional volume contrast ultrasound imaging of the gallbladder compared with tissue harmonic imaging: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Se Hyung Kim; Jeong Min Lee; Kyoung Ho Lee; Young Jun Kim; Su Kyung An; Chang Jin Han; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  The quality of reconstructed 3D images in multidetector-row helical CT: experimental study involving scan parameters.

Authors:  Ji Hoon Shin; Ho Kyu Lee; Choong Gon Choi; Dae Chul Suh; Tae Hwan Lim; Weechang Kang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 5.  Invited article: helical/spiral CT scanning: a pediatric radiology perspective.

Authors:  K S White
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1996

6.  Optimal slice thickness for object detection with longitudinal partial volume effects in computed tomography.

Authors:  Pascal Monnin; Nicolas Sfameni; Achille Gianoli; Sandrine Ding
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Oversampling in the computed tomography measurements applied for bone structure studies as a method of spatial resolution improvement.

Authors:  Grzegorz Tatoń; Eugeniusz Rokita; Tomasz Rok; Felix Beckmann
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2012-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.