Literature DB >> 8597740

Setting priorities, can Britain learn from Sweden?

M McKee1, J Figueras.   

Abstract

The Swedish government recently published a report on priorities in health care. It was written by a cross party group of politicians and drew extensively on the views of the public, health professionals, experience of earlier local exercises in priority setting, and research based evidence. It laid down an ethical framework for approaching issues of health care rationing. Underpinning the framework are the principles of human dignity, need and solidarity, and cost efficiency. The Swedish approach thus contrasts with the British experience of many local initiatives but an absence of national political guidance. The absence of political consensus on many aspects of social policy in the United Kingdom is a major obstacle to developing an agreed ethical framework within which decision makers in the National Health Service can work.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; National Health Service; Parliamentary Priorities Commission (Sweden)

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8597740      PMCID: PMC2350553          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7032.691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  4 in total

1.  Allocating resources to health care: is the QALY (Quality Adjusted Life Year) a technical solution to a political problem?

Authors:  R A Carr-Hill
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.663

2.  On the Oregon trail: rationing health care.

Authors:  R Klein
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-01-05

3.  Explorations in consultation of the public and health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district.

Authors:  A Bowling; B Jacobson; L Southgate
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 4.  Guidelines, enthusiasms, uncertainty, and the limits to purchasing.

Authors:  M McKee; A Clarke
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-14
  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Consulting the public about the NHS.

Authors:  W Anderson; D Florin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-10

2.  Priority setting in health care: trends and models from Scandinavian experiences.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2013-08

3.  Rationing health care: moving the debate forward.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-22

4.  Some dilemmas in managing gynaecological infections.

Authors:  P Owen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Rationing treatment on the NHS--still a political issue.

Authors:  Elias Mossialos; Martin McKee
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 18.000

6.  Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries.

Authors:  Lindsay M Sabik; Reidar K Lie
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2008-01-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.