Literature DB >> 8592719

Evaluation of a new device for measuring responses to posteroanterior forces in a patient population, Part 1: Reliability testing.

J Latimer1, M M Goodsel, M Lee, C G Maher, B N Wilkinson, C C Moran.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: This study determined the test-retest reliability of measurements of responses to posteroanterior (PA) forces made using a recently developed instrument. SUBJECT: Twenty-two subjects with nonspecific low back pain participated.
METHODS: The length of the low- stiffness or "toe" region and the slope of the linear portion of the force-displacement curve were measured on two occasions. Reliability of repeated measurements was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficients and percentage-of-agreement scores. The presence of a systematic change in the response to PA forces was evaluated by a paired-samples t test.
RESULTS: High reliability coefficients were obtained for both indices of the response to PA forces. The t test revealed no systematic change with repeated testing. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The new device provides highly reliable measurement of the lumbar PA force-displacement relationship and may prove useful in evaluating theories that have suggested a relationship between spinal symptoms and abnormal PA stiffness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8592719     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/76.2.158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  7 in total

1.  Performance and reliability of a variable rate, force/displacement application system.

Authors:  Michèle Vaillant; Joel G Pickar; Gregory N Kawchuk
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  The effect of duration and amplitude of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) on spinal stiffness.

Authors:  Michèle Vaillant; Tiffany Edgecombe; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar; Gregory N Kawchuk
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2012-07-17

3.  The intra-rater reliability of a revised 3-point grading system for accessory joint mobilizations.

Authors:  Jennifer Ward; Clair Hebron; Nicola J Petty
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2016-10-11

4.  Comparison of posteroanterior spinal stiffness measures to clinical and demographic findings at baseline in patients enrolled in a clinical study of spinal manipulation for low back pain.

Authors:  Edward F Owens; James W DeVocht; M Ram Gudavalli; David G Wilder; William C Meeker
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  The effect of application site of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) on spinal stiffness.

Authors:  Tiffany L Edgecombe; Greg N Kawchuk; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Development of an Objective Portable Measurement Device for Spinal Joint Accessory Motion Testing.

Authors:  Hsiao-Kuan Wu; Hung-Jen Lai; Ting Teng; Chung-Huang Yu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  The bench-top accuracy of the VerteTrack spinal stiffness assessment device.

Authors:  Anika Young; Michael S Swain; Gregory N Kawchuk; Arnold Y L Wong; Aron S Downie
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2020-08-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.