BACKGROUND: Escherichia coli TEM1 is a penicillinase and belongs to class A beta-lactamases. Its naturally occurring mutants are responsible for bacterial resistance to beta-lactamin-based antibiotics. X-ray structure determinations show that all class A beta-lactamases are similar, but, despite the numerous kinetic investigations, the reaction mechanism of these enzymes is still debated. We address the questions of what the molecular contexts during the acylation and deacylation steps are and how they contribute to the efficiency of these penicillinases. RESULTS: Electrostatic analysis of the 1.8 A resolution refined X-ray structure of the wild-type enzyme, and of its modelled Michaelis and acyl-enzyme complexes, showed that substrate binding induces an upward shift in the pKa of the unprotonated Lys73 by 6.4 pH units. The amine group of Lys73 can then abstract the Ser70 hydroxyl group proton and promote acylation. In the acyl-enzyme complex, the deacylating water is situated between the carboxylate group of Glu166, within the enzyme, and the estercarbonyl carbon of the acyl-enzyme complex, in an electrostatic potential gradient amounting to 30 kTe-1 A-1. Other residues, not directly involved in catalysis, also contribute to the formation of this gradient. The deacylation rate is related to the magnitude of the gradient. The kinetic behavior of site-directed mutants that affect the protonation state of residue 73 cannot be explained on the basis of the wild-type enzyme mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: In the wild-type enzyme, the very high rates of acylation and deacylation of class A beta-lactamases arise from an optimal chemical setup in which the acylation reaction seems triggered by substrate binding that changes the general base property of Lys73. In site-directed mutants where Lys73 is protonated, acylation may proceed through activation of a water molecule by Glu166, and Lys73 contributes as a proton shuffle partner in this pathway.
BACKGROUND:Escherichia coliTEM1 is a penicillinase and belongs to class A beta-lactamases. Its naturally occurring mutants are responsible for bacterial resistance to beta-lactamin-based antibiotics. X-ray structure determinations show that all class A beta-lactamases are similar, but, despite the numerous kinetic investigations, the reaction mechanism of these enzymes is still debated. We address the questions of what the molecular contexts during the acylation and deacylation steps are and how they contribute to the efficiency of these penicillinases. RESULTS: Electrostatic analysis of the 1.8 A resolution refined X-ray structure of the wild-type enzyme, and of its modelled Michaelis and acyl-enzyme complexes, showed that substrate binding induces an upward shift in the pKa of the unprotonated Lys73 by 6.4 pH units. The amine group of Lys73 can then abstract the Ser70 hydroxyl group proton and promote acylation. In the acyl-enzyme complex, the deacylating water is situated between the carboxylate group of Glu166, within the enzyme, and the estercarbonyl carbon of the acyl-enzyme complex, in an electrostatic potential gradient amounting to 30 kTe-1 A-1. Other residues, not directly involved in catalysis, also contribute to the formation of this gradient. The deacylation rate is related to the magnitude of the gradient. The kinetic behavior of site-directed mutants that affect the protonation state of residue 73 cannot be explained on the basis of the wild-type enzyme mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: In the wild-type enzyme, the very high rates of acylation and deacylation of class A beta-lactamases arise from an optimal chemical setup in which the acylation reaction seems triggered by substrate binding that changes the general base property of Lys73. In site-directed mutants where Lys73 is protonated, acylation may proceed through activation of a water molecule by Glu166, and Lys73 contributes as a proton shuffle partner in this pathway.
Authors: Eric M Lewandowski; Kathryn G Lethbridge; Ruslan Sanishvili; Joanna Skiba; Konrad Kowalski; Yu Chen Journal: FEBS J Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 5.542
Authors: C Damblon; X Raquet; L Y Lian; J Lamotte-Brasseur; E Fonze; P Charlier; G C Roberts; J M Frère Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1996-03-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sebastian G Kurz; Kerstin A Wolff; Saugata Hazra; Christopher R Bethel; Andrea M Hujer; Kerri M Smith; Yan Xu; Lee W Tremblay; John S Blanchard; Liem Nguyen; Robert A Bonomo Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2013-09-23 Impact factor: 5.191