Literature DB >> 8588963

Tibial tubercle elevation with bone grafts. A comparative study of autograft and allograft.

O H Cornu1, J de Halleux, X Banse, C Delloye.   

Abstract

We retrospectively investigated the fate of bone auto- and allografts in 64 patients who underwent a tibial tubercle elevation with bone graft. Half of them received an autograft and the other half, an allograft that had been processed and freeze-dried. The two groups had similar preoperative characteristics concerning age, sex and pathology. Roentgenograms were reviewed by three independent observers and scored for fusion, resorption and collapse. Clinical charts were analysed for different variables. The overall radiological score for both groups did not differ statistically. Comparison of graft fixation with one or two screws demonstrated more bone resorption in the case of a single-screw fixation. In such a case, the occurrence of a preoperative tubercle fracture had a significant adverse influence, due to a less stable fixation. From the clinical charts review, only the mean stay at hospital was significantly shorter when an allograft was performed. A bone allograft appears to be suitable to maintain an osteotomy but requires a more careful surgical technique fixation to obtain a similar result to an autograft.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8588963     DOI: 10.1007/bf00448955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  20 in total

1.  The use of freeze-dried fibular allograft in anterior cervical fusion.

Authors:  W Grossman; W C Peppelman; J A Baum; D R Kraus
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The evaluation of cortical and cancellous bone as grafting material; a clinical and experimental study.

Authors:  L C ABBOTT; E R SCHOTTSTAEDT
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1947-04       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Freeze-dried allograft versus autograft bone in scoliosis surgery. A retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  J Recht; F Bayard; C Delloye; A Vincent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Anterior interbody fusion for severe cervical disc degeneration.

Authors:  A F DePalma; R H Rothman; G E Lewinnek; S T Canale
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1972-05

5.  [Lyophilized banked bone. Technic and results after 3 years of use].

Authors:  C Delloye; N Allington; E Munting; A Vincent
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 0.500

6.  A roentgenographic evaluation of frozen allografts versus autografts in anterior cervical spine fusions.

Authors:  M D Brown; T I Malinin; P B Davis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Advancement of the tibial tuberosity.

Authors:  P Maquet
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Lipid extraction enhances bank bone incorporation. An experiment in rabbits.

Authors:  P Aspenberg; K Thorén
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1990-12

9.  HIV inactivation in a bone allograft.

Authors:  J T Mellonig; A B Prewett; M P Moyer
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.993

10.  Allograft versus autograft bone in idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a multivariate statistical analysis.

Authors:  G Fabry
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.