Literature DB >> 8588960

Prophylaxis with oral cefadroxil versus intravenous cefuroxime in trochanteric fracture surgery. A clinical multicentre study.

K S Nungu1, C Olerud, L Rehnberg, S Larsson, P Nordell, I Allvin, S Bengtsson, L Wallinder, G Hedin.   

Abstract

A prospective, randomized study was performed in 559 patients to compare two doses of oral cefadroxil with three doses of intravenous cefuorxime as antibiotic prophylaxis in intra- and subtrochanteric hip fracture surgery. Antibiotic concentrations in the wound fluid were determined at the start and at the end of the operation. The first dose of cefadroxil was given about 2 h before surgery and cefuroxime about 30 min before operation. In 226/242 (93%) patients randomized to oral cefadroxil, the concentration in the wound during surgery was on average 15 micrograms/ml, i.e., well above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC-90) for Staphylococcus aureus. In the cefuroxime group, antibiotic levels in the wound exceeded the MIC-90 for S. aureus in 204/210 (97%) of the patients at the start and/or at the end of surgery. All patients were followed up for 4 months. One deep and five superficial infections occurred in the cefuroxime group and no deep but one superficial infection in the cefadroxil group (P = 0.07). S. aureus was cultured in three of the infected cases while cultures were negative in four patients. Four of the seven infected patients had adequate levels of antibiotic in the wound during surgery, and in three patients no antibiotic assay was performed. The infected patients did not differ in age, sex, operation time, bleeding or any other basic variable compared with patients who healed without complications. Two doses of cefadroxil seems to be practical and as effective as intravenously administered cefuroxime as antibiotic prophylaxis in trochanteric hip fracture surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8588960     DOI: 10.1007/bf00448952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  26 in total

1.  Oral cefadroxil prophylaxis in hip fracture surgery. Serum concentrations studied in 17 patients.

Authors:  K S Nungu; S Bengtsson; C Olerud; L Rehnberg; S Larsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1992-02

2.  Evaluation of a micromethod for determination of antibiotic concentrations in plasma.

Authors:  B Jalling; A S Malmborg; A Lindman; L O Boréus
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  In vitro activities of LY163892, cefaclor, and cefuroxime.

Authors:  C C Knapp; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Antibiotic assays in muscle: are conventional tissue levels misleading as indicator of the antibacterial activity?

Authors:  D M Ryan; O Cars
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  1980

Review 5.  Microbiological investigation of cephalosporins.

Authors:  J M Hamilton-Miller
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Cephalosporin antibiotics as applied in surgery of bones and joints.

Authors:  H C Neu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Principles of antibiotic usage.

Authors:  R Quintiliani; C Nightingale
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Cephalothin and cefamandole penetration into bone, synovial fluid, and wound drainage fluid.

Authors:  D J Schurman; H P Hirshman; D S Burton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Prophylaxis against infection. Single-dose cefonicid compared with multiple-dose cefamandole.

Authors:  S Garcia; M L Lozano; J M Gatell; E Soriano; R Ramon; J G Sanmiguel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  In vitro activity of cefpodoxime, a new oral cephalosporin, compared with that of nine other antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  M Sheppard; A King; I Phillips
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of ceftibuten vs. amoxicillin/clavulanic acid as antibiotic prophylaxis in cholecystectomy and/or biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  H Orozco; J Sifuentes-Osornio; C Chan; H Medina-Franco; F Vargas-Vorackova; E Prado; J Arch
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Prevention of surgical site infection after open prosthetic inguinal hernia repair: efficacy of parenteral versus oral prophylaxis with amoxicillin-clavulanic acid in a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mehmet A Kuzu; Selçuk Hazinedaroğlu; Sükrü Dolalan; Namik Ozkan; Samet Yalçin; A Bülent Erkek; Hatem Mahmoudi; Acar Tüzüner; Atilla H Elhan; Ercümet Kuterdem
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery for proximal femoral and other closed long bone fractures.

Authors:  William J Gillespie; Geert Him Walenkamp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-03-17

4.  Antibiotic prophylaxis as a quality of care indicator: does it help in the fight against surgical site infections following fragility hip fractures?

Authors:  Tal Frenkel Rutenberg; Anat Aizer; Avraham Levi; Noa Naftali; Shelly Zeituni; Steven Velkes; Anat Aka Zohar
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  Antimicrobial agents in orthopaedic surgery: Prophylaxis and treatment.

Authors:  Andrej Trampuz; Werner Zimmerli
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.431

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.