Literature DB >> 3319504

Microbiological investigation of cephalosporins.

J M Hamilton-Miller1.   

Abstract

The most important role of the clinical microbiology laboratory is to advise clinicians in their choice of antimicrobial therapy. While the application of modern laboratory techniques is enabling sensitivity testing to cephalosporins to be performed with increasing precision, the ability to predict accurately clinical efficacy has not improved in parallel. For the cephem group in particular, the present confusion as to the numerical value of breakpoints and their interpretation, and the overuse of 'class testing' are making the task of the clinical microbiologist more difficult. For most purposes, simple disc sensitivity testing of cephems gives sufficient information, and it is simple to carry out, as no special media or growth conditions are required. Further studies are required to answer an outstanding question of great importance, namely, what the clinical prognostic significance is of results of sensitivity testing of 'methicillin-resistant' Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, as these organisms often appear sensitive to cephems in vitro. For the research worker, the cephems provide tools of almost unrivalled power in the investigation of such microbiologically important topics as cell wall synthesis, bacteriolysis, membrane function and various aspects of enzyme regulation and inhibition. Relatively minor changes in the structure of cephem molecules can markedly affect their binding to bacteria, thus allowing probing of the functions of the individual penicillin-binding proteins. In Gram-negative bacteria, membrane function can be selectively changed by the action of subinhibitory concentrations of cephems, as it is intimately connected to the integrity of the peptidoglycan moiety. Induction and derepression of beta-lactamases may be responsible for a new type of bacterial resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3319504     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198700342-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  119 in total

1.  Unrealistic nature of the 'MIC'.

Authors:  D Greenwood
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  E-0702, a new cephalosporin, is incorporated into Escherichia coli cells via the tonB-dependent iron transport system.

Authors:  N A Watanabe; T Nagasu; K Katsu; K Kitoh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Penetration of cefoxitin into cerebrospinal fluid of dogs with and without experimental meningitis.

Authors:  P Massip; M D Kitzis; V T Tran; M J Armengaud; M Armengaud
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1979 Jan-Feb

4.  Synergism between beta-lactam antibiotics: a test of theoretical predictions made with Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J M Hamilton-Miller; J Ramsay
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Evaluation of cefamandole therapy of patients with bacterial meningitis.

Authors:  O M Korzeniowski; E M Carvalho; H Rocha; M A Sande
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Influence of laboratory reports on prescribing of antimicrobials for urinary tract infection.

Authors:  M P Barnes
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  In vivo interaction of beta-lactam antibiotics with the penicillin-binding proteins of Streptococcus pneumoniae.

Authors:  R Williamson; R Hakenbeck; A Tomasz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Empiric treatment of infections in neutropenic patients with cancer.

Authors:  J Klastersky
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1983 Mar-Apr

9.  Properties of the penicillin-binding proteins of four species of the genus Bacteroides.

Authors:  L J Piddock; R Wise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Comparison of the chemotherapeutic and pharmacodynamic activities of cephradine, cephalothin, and cephaloridine in mice.

Authors:  G J Miraglia; K J Renz; H H Gadebusch
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1973-02       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  8 in total

1.  Subinhibitory antimicrobial concentrations: A review of in vitro and in vivo data.

Authors:  G G Zhanel; D J Hoban; G K Harding
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1992-07

2.  Randomised double-blind study of norfloxacin and cefadroxil in the treatment of acute pyelonephritis.

Authors:  T Sandberg; G Englund; K Lincoln; L G Nilsson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  In vitro antibacterial effects of cephalosporins.

Authors:  J D Williams; F Moosdeen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Role of cephalosporins in gonorrhoea and other sexually transmitted diseases.

Authors:  I Phillips
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Cephalosporins in gram-positive infections.

Authors:  J Symonds; A M Geddes
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Mechanisms of resistance to cephalosporin antibiotics.

Authors:  D M Livermore
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Cephalosporins 1945-1986.

Authors:  E P Abraham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Prophylaxis with oral cefadroxil versus intravenous cefuroxime in trochanteric fracture surgery. A clinical multicentre study.

Authors:  K S Nungu; C Olerud; L Rehnberg; S Larsson; P Nordell; I Allvin; S Bengtsson; L Wallinder; G Hedin
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.067

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.