Literature DB >> 8588170

A test to measure lift capacity of physically impaired adults. Part 2--Reactivity in a patient sample.

L N Matheson1, V Mooney, D Holmes, S Leggett, J E Grant, S Negri, B Holmes.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Test reactivity is the based on the idea that experience with a test may affect performance on subsequent tests, independent of what the test purports to measure. The reactivity of a test of lift capacity was studied in a single-blind randomized clinical trial was studied in a single-blind randomized clinical trial in which subjects were assigned to one or two groups. One group received lift testing before and after a therapeutic trial, while the other group received lift testing only at the conclusion of the therapeutic trial.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the reactivity of a lift capacity test over the course of treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The reactivity of a test is an important criterion by which an outcome measure must be judged. Change in response to treatment is assumed to be independent of changes resulting from the evaluee's experience with the test, although this is rarely addressed.
METHODS: The EPIC Lift Capacity test was administered to 55 patients with low back pain in a treatment program after they were randomized into a pre-test/post-test and a post-test only group. Additional measures were taken on a pre-test/post-test basis for all subjects.
RESULTS: Analyses of variance demonstrated no difference between the randomized groups after treatment. However, the pre-test/post-test group demonstrated significant improvement over the course of treatment. Other measures of outcome were similarly affected.
CONCLUSION: The reactivity of the EPIC Lift Capacity test was negligible over an 8-week treatment regimen that did not include lifting tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8588170     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199510000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

Review 1.  Definition and assessment of specific occupational demands concerning lifting, pushing, and pulling based on a systematic literature search.

Authors:  J Bos; P P F M Kuijer; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Measurement properties of performance-based assessment of functional capacity.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-09

Review 3.  Assessment of functional capacity of the musculoskeletal system in the context of work, daily living, and sport: a systematic review.

Authors:  Haije Wind; Vincent Gouttebarge; P Paul F M Kuijer; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-06

4.  Relationships among age, body weight, resting heart rate, and performance in a new test of lift capacity.

Authors:  L N Matheson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1996-12

5.  [Multidisciplinary treatment program for chronic low back pain, part 2. Somatic aspects].

Authors:  P Saur; J Hildebrandt; M Pfingsten; D Seeger; U Steinmetz; A Straub; J Hahn; B Kasi; R Heinemann; D Koch
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1996-10-28       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  Pain response of healthy workers following a functional capacity evaluation and implications for clinical interpretation.

Authors:  Remko Soer; Johan W Groothoff; Jan H B Geertzen; Cees P van der Schans; David D Reesink; Michiel F Reneman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-04-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.