Literature DB >> 8584623

Comparison of the effects of nicotine on a fixed rate and a subject-paced version of the rapid information processing task.

B Baldinger1, M Hasenfratz, K Bättig.   

Abstract

In a modified "subject-paced" rather than fixed rate version of a rapid information processing (RIP) task, the presentation rate of the stimuli is continuously adapted to the individual performance level. Thus, this modified task version probably assesses a continuous "speed function" rather than mere "vigilance". In order to compare the two task versions more directly, we carried out a study which assessed the effects of a regular nicotine cigarette and the nearly nicotine-free cigarette NEXT on both task versions under the same experimental conditions. The dominant alpha frequency pointed to a greater arousal evoked by the subject-paced RIP version compared with the fixed rate version. With the fixed rate version, smoking nicotine cigarettes reduced reaction times, whereas with the subject-paced version, processing rate was improved. Additionally, smoking NEXT decreased craving less than smoking the regular cigarettes. It was concluded that the two task versions are sensitive to different cognitive functions. Whereas the subject-paced version was more sensitive to effects on the speed of processing, the fixed rate version was more sensitive to effects on reaction time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8584623     DOI: 10.1007/bf02246080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  17 in total

1.  Extraversion-introversion and improvement in an auditory vigilance task.

Authors:  P BAKAN
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1959-11

Review 2.  Nicotine as a cognitive enhancer.

Authors:  D M Warburton
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.067

3.  Can smoking increase attention in rapid information processing during noise? Electrocortical, physiological and behavioral effects.

Authors:  M Hasenfratz; C Michel; R Nil; K Bättig
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Effect of coffee on the speed of subject-paced information processing.

Authors:  K Bättig; R Buzzi
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.328

5.  Antagonistic effects of caffeine and alcohol on mental performance parameters.

Authors:  M Hasenfratz; A Bunge; G Dal Prá; K Bättig
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Psychophysiological interactions between smoking and stress coping?

Authors:  M Hasenfratz; K Bättig
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Acute dose-effect relationships of caffeine and mental performance, EEG, cardiovascular and subjective parameters.

Authors:  M Hasenfratz; K Bättig
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Effects of smoking on rapid information processing performance.

Authors:  K Wesnes; D M Warburton
Journal:  Neuropsychobiology       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.328

9.  Measuring degree of physical dependence to tobacco smoking with reference to individualization of treatment.

Authors:  K O Fagerström
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 3.913

10.  Nicotine or tar titration in cigarette smoking behavior?

Authors:  M Hasenfratz; B Baldinger; K Bättig
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  12 in total

1.  The early time course of smoking withdrawal effects.

Authors:  Peter S Hendricks; Joseph W Ditre; David J Drobes; Thomas H Brandon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-06-03       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Effects of d-amphetamine in human models of information processing and inhibitory control.

Authors:  Mark T Fillmore; Thomas H Kelly; Catherine A Martin
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2005-02-14       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Effects of cigarette smoking and abstinence on Stroop task performance.

Authors:  Catherine P Domier; John R Monterosso; Arthur L Brody; Sara L Simon; Adrianna Mendrek; Richard Olmstead; Murray E Jarvik; Mark S Cohen; Edythe D London
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Nicotine and nonnicotine factors in cigarette addiction.

Authors:  Jed E Rose
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  C957T polymorphism of the dopamine D2 receptor gene modulates the effect of nicotine on working memory performance and cortical processing efficiency.

Authors:  Leslie K Jacobsen; Kenneth R Pugh; W Einar Mencl; Joel Gelernter
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-08-09       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  The effects of nicotine dose expectancy and motivationally relevant distracters on vigilance.

Authors:  Jason D Robinson; Jeffery M Engelmann; Yong Cui; Francesco Versace; Andrew J Waters; David G Gilbert; Ellen R Gritz; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2014-05-19

7.  Acute effects of nicotine on visual search tasks in young adult smokers.

Authors:  Nicola Rycroft; Jennifer M Rusted; Samuel B Hutton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  The influence of nicotine dose and nicotine dose expectancy on the cognitive and subjective effects of cigarette smoking.

Authors:  Laura M Juliano; Lisa M Fucito; Paul T Harrell
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 9.  Clinical trials methods for evaluation of potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Karen Hanson; Anna Briggs; Mark Parascandola; Jeanine M Genkinger; Richard O'Connor; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Attentional bias to smoking and other motivationally relevant cues is affected by nicotine exposure and dose expectancy.

Authors:  Jason D Robinson; Francesco Versace; Jeffery M Engelmann; Yong Cui; David G Gilbert; Andrew J Waters; Ellen R Gritz; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.