Literature DB >> 8584127

Comparison of magnetoencephalography, functional MRI, and motor evoked potentials in the localization of the sensory-motor cortex.

T Morioka1, T Yamamoto, A Mizushima, S Tombimatsu, H Shigeto, K Hasuo, S Nishio, K Fujii, M Fukui.   

Abstract

To clarify the topographical relationship between peri-Rolandic lesions and the central sulcus, we carried out presurgical functional mapping by using magnetoencephalography (MEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (f-MRI), and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) on 5 patients. The sensory cortex was identified by somatosensory evoked magnetic fields using MEG (magnetic source imaging (MSI)). The motor area of the hand region was identified using f-MRI, during a hand squeezing task. In addition, transcranial magnetic stimulation localized the hand motor area on the scalp, which was mapped onto the MRI. In all cases, the sensory cortex was easily identified by MSI and the results of MSI correlated well with the findings obtained by the intraoperative recording of somatosensory evoked potentials. In contrast, the motor cortex could not be localized by f-MRI due to either the activated signal of the large cortical vein or the lack of any functional activation in the area of peri-lesional edema. MEPs were also unable to localize the entire motor strip. Therefore, at present, MSI is considered to be the most reliable method to localize peri-Rolandic lesions [corrected].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8584127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Res        ISSN: 0161-6412            Impact factor:   2.448


  9 in total

1.  Assessment of functional MR imaging in neurosurgical planning.

Authors:  C C Lee; H A Ward; F W Sharbrough; F B Meyer; W R Marsh; C Raffel; E L So; G D Cascino; C Shin; Y Xu; S J Riederer; C R Jack
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Motor field sensitivity for preoperative localization of motor cortex.

Authors:  Peter T Lin; Mitchel S Berger; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 3.  Magnetoencephalography in the preoperative evaluation for epilepsy surgery.

Authors:  Christopher T Anderson; Chad E Carlson; Zhimin Li; Manoj Raghavan
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Focusing and targeting of magnetic brain stimulation using multiple coils.

Authors:  J Ruohonen; R J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  The "White Gray Sign" Identifies the Central Sulcus on 3T High-Resolution T1-Weighted Images.

Authors:  O F Kaneko; N J Fischbein; J Rosenberg; M Wintermark; M M Zeineh
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Electric field strength and focality in electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy: a finite element simulation study.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Function in the human connectome: task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior.

Authors:  Deanna M Barch; Gregory C Burgess; Michael P Harms; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar; Maurizio Corbetta; Matthew F Glasser; Sandra Curtiss; Sachin Dixit; Cindy Feldt; Dan Nolan; Edward Bryant; Tucker Hartley; Owen Footer; James M Bjork; Russ Poldrack; Steve Smith; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Abraham Z Snyder; David C Van Essen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Localization of Sensorimotor Cortex Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Minna Pitkänen; Shogo Yazawa; Katja Airaksinen; Pantelis Lioumis; Jussi Nurminen; Eero Pekkonen; Jyrki P Mäkelä
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  MRI Guided Brain Stimulation without the Use of a Neuronavigation System.

Authors:  Ehsan Vaghefi; Peng Cai; Fang Fang; Winston D Byblow; Cathy M Stinear; Benjamin Thompson
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.