Literature DB >> 21248385

Electric field strength and focality in electroconvulsive therapy and magnetic seizure therapy: a finite element simulation study.

Zhi-De Deng1, Sarah H Lisanby, Angel V Peterchev.   

Abstract

We present the first computational study comparing the electric field induced by various electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and magnetic seizure therapy (MST) paradigms. Four ECT electrode configurations (bilateral, bifrontal, right unilateral, and focal electrically administered seizure therapy) and three MST coil configurations (circular, cap, and double cone) were modeled. The model incorporated a modality-specific neural activation threshold. ECT (0.3 ms pulse width) and MST induced the maximum electric field of 2.1-2.5 V cm⁻¹ and 1.1-2.2 V cm⁻¹ in the brain, corresponding to 6.2-7.2 times and 1.2-2.3 times the neural activation threshold, respectively. The MST electric field is more confined to the superficial cortex compared to ECT. The brain volume stimulated was much larger with ECT (up to 100%) than with MST (up to 8.2%). MST with the double-cone coil was the most focal, and bilateral ECT was the least focal. Our results suggest a possible biophysical explanation of the reduced side effects of MST compared to ECT. Our results also indicate that the conventional ECT pulse amplitude (800-900 mA) is much higher than necessary for seizure induction. Reducing the ECT pulse amplitude should be explored as a potential means of diminishing side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21248385      PMCID: PMC3903509          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/1/016007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  112 in total

1.  [ECT versus transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): preliminary data of computer modeling].

Authors:  T Zyss; A Krawczyk; P Drzymała; J Starzyński
Journal:  Psychiatr Pol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.657

2.  Distinct differences in cortical reactivity of motor and prefrontal cortices to magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Seppo Kähkönen; Juha Wilenius; Soile Komssi; Risto J Ilmoniemi
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Charge and energy minimization in electrical/magnetic stimulation of nervous tissue.

Authors:  Saso Jezernik; Thomas Sinkjaer; Manfred Morari
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  A reconstruction of the conductive phenomena elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation in heterogeneous brain tissue.

Authors:  Nicola Toschi; Tobias Welt; Maria Guerrisi; Martin E Keck
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 2.685

5.  The current path in electric convulsion shock.

Authors:  K J HAYES
Journal:  Arch Neurol Psychiatry       Date:  1950-01

6.  A theoretical calculation of the electric field induced by magnetic stimulation of a peripheral nerve.

Authors:  B J Roth; L G Cohen; M Hallett; W Friauf; P J Basser
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.217

7.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bilateral and right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy at different stimulus intensities.

Authors:  H A Sackeim; J Prudic; D P Devanand; M S Nobler; S H Lisanby; S Peyser; L Fitzsimons; B J Moody; J Clark
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2000-05

8.  Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 2. Multiple descending volleys.

Authors:  B L Day; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; J P Dick; J M Cowan; A Berardelli; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Magnetic brain stimulation and brain size: relevance to animal studies.

Authors:  J D Weissman; C M Epstein; K R Davey
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1992-06

10.  Localizing the site of magnetic brain stimulation in humans.

Authors:  C M Epstein; D G Schwartzberg; K R Davey; D B Sudderth
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  52 in total

Review 1.  Somatic treatments for mood disorders.

Authors:  Moacyr A Rosa; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection, and reporting practices.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Timothy A Wagner; Pedro C Miranda; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Sarah H Lisanby; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  A Review of Brain Stimulation Treatments for Late-Life Depression.

Authors:  Daniel M Blumberger; Jonathan H Hsu; Zafiris J Daskalakis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09-28

4.  [Brain stimulation procedures. Transcranial magnetic stimulation, magnetic seizure therapy and deep brain stimulation].

Authors:  T E Schläpfer; S Kayser
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  What is the role of brain stimulation therapies in the treatment of depression?

Authors:  Daniel M Blumberger; Benoit H Mulsant; Zafiris J Daskalakis
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  The effect of tissue anisotropy on the radial and tangential components of the electric field in transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Mohamed K Metwally; Seung Moo Han; Tae-Seong Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Adopting reciprocity theorem in deep transcranial magnetic stimulation problem to design an efficient single source coil array based on nerve cell direction.

Authors:  Ali Mohtadi Jafari; Ali Abdolali
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Neurocognitive Effects of Combined Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) and Venlafaxine in Geriatric Depression: Phase 1 of the PRIDE Study.

Authors:  Sarah H Lisanby; Shawn M McClintock; George Alexopoulos; Samuel H Bailine; Elisabeth Bernhardt; Mimi C Briggs; C Munro Cullum; Zhi-De Deng; Mary Dooley; Emma T Geduldig; Robert M Greenberg; Mustafa M Husain; Styliani Kaliora; Rebecca G Knapp; Vassilios Latoussakis; Lauren S Liebman; William V McCall; Martina Mueller; Georgios Petrides; Joan Prudic; Peter B Rosenquist; Matthew V Rudorfer; Shirlene Sampson; Abeba A Teklehaimanot; Kristen G Tobias; Richard D Weiner; Robert C Young; Charles H Kellner
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 9.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

10.  Electric Field Model of Transcranial Electric Stimulation in Nonhuman Primates: Correspondence to Individual Motor Threshold.

Authors:  Won Hee Lee; Sarah H Lisanby; Andrew F Laine; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.