Literature DB >> 8583522

Distance and volume measurement using three-dimensional ultrasonography.

M Riccabona1, T R Nelson, D H Pretorius, T E Davidson.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of distance and volume measurements obtained by three-dimensional ultrasonography. A tissue-mimicking phantom was scanned using a prototype three-dimensional sonographic imaging system to verify distance measurements. Measurements were taken from the reconstructed three-dimensional sonographic data and compared to the real distances. Volume measurements were obtained by scanning 30 balloons of various shapes, sized 23 ml to 2400 ml. Each balloon was scanned twice in two orientations; three different masks were accomplished for each volume. Each volume measurement of 180 three-dimensional sonographic measurements was compared to conventional two-dimensional ultrasonographic volume estimates and to the actual, measured balloon size. Distance measurements had a mean error of 0.02 +/- 3.65% (range, -4.27 to 7.18%). Two-dimensional sonographic volume estimates using traditional scanner based methods had a mean error of 13.7 +/- 10.1%. Three-dimensional sonographic volume measurements had a mean error of 2.2 +/- 2.9% for regular and irregular objects over the entire range of volumes. The masking required 10 to 30 min. The field of view varied from 10 to 24 cm with a mean object depth of 9.8 cm. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic methods can provide accurate volume measurements of regular and irregular objects and offer improved accuracy compared to traditional two-dimensional methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8583522     DOI: 10.7863/jum.1995.14.12.881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  11 in total

1.  Three-dimensional sonographic evaluation of the fetal lumbar spinal canal.

Authors:  Thomas Wallny; Ralf L Schild; Rolf Fimmers; Manfred E Hansmann
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Potential of three-dimensional ultrasound in neonatal and paediatric neurosonography.

Authors:  M Riccabona; T R Nelson; C Weitzer; B Resch; D P Pretorius
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  The use of inversion mode and 3D manual segmentation in volume measurement of fetal fluid-filled structures: comparison with Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis (VOCAL).

Authors:  J P Kusanovic; J K Nien; L F Gonçalves; J Espinoza; W Lee; M Balasubramaniam; E Soto; O Erez; R Romero
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  Three-dimensional ultrasound scanning.

Authors:  Aaron Fenster; Grace Parraga; Jeff Bax
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  State-of-the-Art Renal Imaging in Children.

Authors:  Bernarda Viteri; Juan S Calle-Toro; Susan Furth; Kassa Darge; Erum A Hartung; Hansel Otero
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  In vivo high-frequency, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of uveal melanoma in mice: imaging features and histopathologic correlations.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Hua Yang; Shin J Kang; Yanggan Wang; Geoffrey D Wang; Tonya Coulthard; Hans E Grossniklaus
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  Potential role of 3DUS in infants and children.

Authors:  Michael Riccabona
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-04-27

8.  Potential applications of three-dimensional ultrasound in the pediatric urinary tract: pictorial demonstration based on preliminary results.

Authors:  M Riccabona; G Fritz; E Ring
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Estimation of uterine volume: A comparison between Viewpoint and 3D ultrasound estimation in women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ishwari Casikar; Max Mongelli; Shannon Reid; George Condous
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

10.  Correlations between the various methods of estimating prostate volume: transabdominal, transrectal, and three-dimensional US.

Authors:  Sun Ho Kim; Seung Hyup Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.