Literature DB >> 8581550

Bridges between health care research evidence and clinical practice.

R B Haynes1, R S Hayward, J Lomas.   

Abstract

Research is producing increasing amounts of important new evidence for health care, but there is a large gap between what this evidence shows can be done and the care that most patients actually receive. An important reason for this gap is the extensive processing that evidence requires before application. This article discusses a three-step model for bridging research evidence to management of clinical problems: getting the evidence straight, formulating evidence-based clinical policies, and applying evidence-based clinical policies at the right place and time. This model is purposely broad in scope and provides a framework for coordinating efforts to support evidence-based medical care. The authors' purpose is to represent the roles of health informatics in the context of the roles of all the key players, including health care researchers and practitioners, health care organizations, and the public. Health informatics has already made important contributions to bridging evidence to practice, including improving evidence retrieval, evaluation, and synthesis; new evidence-based information products; and computerized aids for facilitating the use of these products during clinical decision making. However, much more innovation and coordination are needed. The authors call for health informaticians to pay balanced attention to 1) the quality of evidence embodied in information innovations, 2) the performance of technologies and systems that retrieve, prepare, disseminate, and apply evidence, and 3) the fit of information tools to the specific clinical circumstances in which evidence is to be applied. Effective interdisciplinary teams that include health services researchers and other evidence experts, clinical practitioners, informaticians, and health care managers are needed to achieve success. Informaticians can make increasingly important contributions to the transfer of health care research by joining such teams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8581550      PMCID: PMC116277          DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1995.96157827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  66 in total

Review 1.  More informative abstracts revisited.

Authors:  R B Haynes; C D Mulrow; E J Huth; D G Altman; M J Gardner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Bibliographic retrieval: a survey of individual users of MEDLINE.

Authors:  K T Wallingford; B L Humphreys; N E Selinger; E R Siegel
Journal:  MD Comput       Date:  1990 May-Jun

3.  Guidelines for reading literature reviews.

Authors:  A D Oxman; G H Guyatt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Decision analysis: a progress report.

Authors:  J P Kassirer; A J Moskowitz; J Lau; S G Pauker
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. A study of use and usefulness.

Authors:  R B Haynes; K A McKibbon; C J Walker; N Ryan; D Fitzgerald; M F Ramsden
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-01-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Clinical practice guidelines: between science and art.

Authors:  R N Battista; M J Hodge
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Implementing practice guidelines.

Authors:  G Anderson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Computer-assisted optimization of aminophylline therapy in the emergency department.

Authors:  E R Gonzalez; B A Vanderheyden; J P Ornato; T G Comstock
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.469

9.  What's wrong with decision analysis? Can the left brain influence the right?

Authors:  A S Detsky; D Redelmeier; H B Abrams
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

10.  Computerized reminders to encourage cervical screening in family practice.

Authors:  I McDowell; C Newell; W Rosser
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Bridging the inferential gap: the electronic health record and clinical evidence.

Authors:  Walter F Stewart; Nirav R Shah; Mark J Selna; Ronald A Paulus; James M Walker
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  A randomized effectiveness trial of a clinical informatics consult service: impact on evidence-based decision-making and knowledge implementation.

Authors:  Shelagh A Mulvaney; Leonard Bickman; Nunzia B Giuse; E Warren Lambert; Nila A Sathe; Rebecca N Jerome
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Evidence-based Medicine:: An overview.

Authors:  K Bhargava; R Jaeschke
Journal:  J Sci Res Med Sci       Date:  2001-10

4.  Trample the weak, hurdle the dead: the tribulations of integrating research into clinical practice.

Authors:  Chad Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

Review 5.  The basis for using the Internet to support the information needs of primary care.

Authors:  E E Westberg; R A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  "Is my practice evidence-based?".

Authors:  T Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-10-19

Review 7.  Factors Contributing to Variations in Physicians' Use of Evidence at The Point of Care: A Conceptual Model.

Authors:  James D Reschovsky; Eugene C Rich; Timothy K Lake
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  A framework for training health professionals in implementation and dissemination science.

Authors:  Ralph Gonzales; Margaret A Handley; Sara Ackerman; Patricia S Oʼsullivan
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology.

Authors:  D W Bates; M Cohen; L L Leape; J M Overhage; M M Shabot; T Sheridan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 10.  A review of online evidence-based practice point-of-care information summary providers.

Authors:  Rita Banzi; Alessandro Liberati; Ivan Moschetti; Ludovica Tagliabue; Lorenzo Moja
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.